until when robert mueller was named the special counsel. as we have are supported on the show, jerome and barr have spoken with multiple officials from the u.k., austria, even traveled to italy all in an effort to determine the most powerful in tools of intelligence were used against our own citizens. of course to circumvent american laws and that constitutional protection paid by the way, thae like fisa abuse, premeditated the rod, one of the saddest things from my sources tonight, they are worried about if they will get a conviction in d.c. that shouldn t matter. the law is the law. was it verified or not verified? we will have answers to a lot of these questions coming. did officials circumvent u.s. law outsourced surveillance and the other sense on americans to allied s by the agencies? in other words, you do this for us and in this way we are innocent. the trump campaign, where they
a little real talking. we all get politics is often about trash talk, even. i ll stipulate that this president likes to be provocative. it messes with the media and gets him a lot of attention. there s also a point at which what he is saying is inherently abnormal and a dereliction of his duty. his oath is to faithfully execute the office of the president. his oath is to preserve and protect the constitution. i argue that he s not doing either. he clearly thinks this economy is shaky. that s okay. but that s the only reason that he s attacking the fed chief powell. you can argue powell raised the rates too fast and too much, but if the economy is so strong, it shouldn t matter, and certainly
should reflect the amount of legal immigrants to be happier than number of citizens that we have to properly apportion seats of the houses of representatives, this shouldn t be a controversial thing. this is one more things that the democrats want to do to shun the trump administration. neil: the one thing that i thought about this, i know we used to have this question years ago in census questions. i would want to get to the bottom is why was it taken off in the first place? that s a separate area. nevertheless, they want to look for what is the genesis for putting this question back in there. do we know whether it s bad or good? we know how it got back in there. does it matter? really materially shouldn t matter. the legal intention of the question is to make sure that citizens are represented in the house, to make sure that we re not inappropriately allocating extra representation towards
something that he says shouldn t matter. if you can get mueller in the chair he can answer the fundamental question. did you leave work to be done by congress on obstruction or not. are there things to pursue. is it worth the time or not? there s a good chance he can answer the questions many ways. that will give the can you want clarity. do they deserve to hear from him? i don t think it s worth or time. to hear from mueller? why not. on the charge of obstruction, i can tell you this. if mueller and the team of registered democrats who have a history for that s not a fair characterization of the team. make your point. it is. he s a conservative. more republican than you have been on your best day. why would you a sail credentials? i doubt that. you think you re more of a republican than bob mueller? yes. i actually do. i m more of a conservative than
proposals there s things that can be done but they can t be done when you have jerry nadler on a train days after the midterm election saying i not only want to impeach trump but also kavanaugh. we can work together but your party legislating rather than investigating. but you always had when presidents are investigated they still keep working. bill clinton did some of his best work right on the verge of being removed from office. he seems to want to obsess about something that he says shouldn t matter. if you get mueller in the chair he can answer the fundamental question, did you leave work to be done on obstruction. did you think there s things to pursue? is it worth or time or not? there s a good chance he could