maybe what s not on the table. there s part of this federal statute that we re talking about which says that if you are in fact convicted for basically taking documents that you shouldn t take, destroying documents that you could in fact be disqualified from holding federal office, and federal office i think would include the presidency. the problem here is the constitution that actually lays out the qualifications for being president is and when there is a conflict between the constitution and a congressional statute, we know who wins, and it s the constitution. so i know there s been a lot of talk about if he s convicted would he be disqualified from holding office again? i think the answer is no. he s over 35. he was born in this country. he s lived here for 14 years. if we want to look at a constitutional provision that would potentially prohibit him from being president again, that s part of the 14th
angering the regime more. here to react fox news senior strategic analyst retired four-star general jack keane. general come of this administration and this democratic speaker are not on the same page but how does that make us look? well i think right from the beginning the reason why this thing got spun up so much, obviously there was a leak the nancy pelosi was going to visit taiwan. that leak came from this administration. somebody who was obviously opposed to it. but really what happened is when the president made the offhand remark in response to a question walking out of the room where he said while the pentagon doesn t favor or the united states military doesn t favor. that wasn t a completely true statement. they just provided some of the risks that were going on. i didn t save it as it shouldn t take place but that spun up the prc entire propaganda effort as a result of it. because they saw an opportunity here, a division in the united states government, and an