i mean, there are no words to describe what this man must have felt at the time, the fear. the guy reaches over, his limp body to press the button so he can get out. prayerfully, thankfully that man stayed still. who knows what would have happened if he realized it was awake. he waits for the other guy to leave and gets up. this is a sham hearing. you are using this as a political stunt. this is not democracy. this is the antithesis of democracy. this is an absurd and poor reflection of who we are as americans. this isn t government. it is not working for the american people. it is grandstanding. it is a stunt.
released today, one that endorsed mandela barnes. the paper did not pull any punches. this incompetent center has compiled an appallingly slim list of accomplishments for 12 years in office. as far as things johnson has done an office, the pace burnouts, he s played fast and loose with the facts for years. he s an anti-science superspreader of conspiracies who s claimed some spots global warming, and one of the vaccines that saved millions of lives could make the covid-19 pandemic worse. it took johnson more than a month to acknowledge the obvious that joe biden had defeated donald trump for the presidency. even, then the senator held a sham hearing the next day that allowed trump s lawyers to err arguments that had been shot down in courtrooms across the country. the paper goes on to accuse johnson of lying about his involvement in the fake electors scheme, trying to politicize the social safety
covid pandemic worse. it took johnson more than a month acknowledge the obvious joe biden defeated president trump for the presidency. then he held a sham hearing that allowed the lawyers to ignore rulings that were shot down in the courts. he lied about his involvement in the state s fake lektor scheme of trying to politicize social safety net and the paper says johnson has been running racist ads. now just to remind you this is coming the usa today network s editorial board. they don t normally weigh in on candidates. they said they made an exception this time because the stakes here are that high and they have more than a few concerns about senator ron johnson. clearly. in contrast, here s what the paper said about johnson s opponent, mandela barnes. he is young at 35. but he served two terms as state representative and won as lieutenant governor. his positions on the major issues facing the country are
lives could make the covid-19 pandemic worse. it took johnson more than a month to acknowledge the obvious that joe biden had defeated donald trump for the presidency. even, then the senator held a sham hearing the next day that allowed trump s lawyers to err arguments that had been shot down in courtrooms across the country. the paper goes on to accuse johnson of lying about his involvement in the fake electors scheme, trying to politicize the social safety net, and the papers as johnson has been running racist ads. now, just to remind you, this is coming from the usa today network s editorial board. the usa today network does not normally weigh in on candidates, but they said they made an exception this time because the stakes here are that high. and they have more than a few concerns about senator ron johnson. clearly. in contrast, here s what the paper said about his opponent, mandela barnes. mandela barnes is young at 35, but he s served two terms as a
states and is therefore worthy of being indicted. . as we look ahead to the hearings this week, there are people who are convinced that this was a fraudulent election, there s already been these four public hearings. is there a gauge, michael, of how the hearings thus far has shaped public opinion about january 6th and about vice president pence? well, clearly we know that the true believers for trump are still true blelievers. they re not listening because they think it s a sham hearing because president trump told them that. that group in the middle that said, let s hear the evidence, let s see what they have to say about whether trump did or didn t violate laws, and i think those people, if they are listening, can t find any basis to conclude that trump didn t incite a riot and didn t obstruct official proceedings.