if he were a no-name joe cruising minnesota state fair grabbing women, he would be liable to arrest certainly and at the very least a do not admit sign, i mean, the average person in new york city doesn t get to go around groping women and say it was a joke. you know what, the amazing thing is these people passed the laws and make laws so they don t have to be accountable. we saw this with bill clinton. he passed sexual harassment law that he himself violated. always good to talk to you. thank you, judge. next the little sisters of the poor head back to court to fight for their religious rights. you re not going to believe this. i will saddle up and take you exclusive look at the southern border, justice in a moment. whoooo.
about civil rights laws which is what sexual harassment is on the workplace or on campus, the opinion of the harasser is really irrelevant. the only person whose state of meend matters is the receiver of harm, the victim who says i was offended, it was unwelcome, i didn t want to see your naked body. she wins. if she s credible, she wins. under what circumstances do we think a young girl goes into her boss s office, hotel room, home, he exposes himself, and that s something that s wanted? it seems to me clear and a lot of these women it s consistent how they describe it. they stiffen up, they say no, they cry. how much clearer do you need to be? chris, i don t know how scary it is for everybody to see a naked body, but the point is it s not welcomed conduct. it is unwanted. that s the key word in sexual
apparently for decades in terms of enabling and assisting him. it s just incredible. i mean, what s been going on with him for so long. and he s just come out and admitted everything. so the liability is going to be staggering. here s what s so sick, danny. what if this predatory behavior isn t technically illegal? then what? you bring up a good point. because first we have to assume for the moment any of these potential claimants are within the civil statute of limitations. if we just assume that for now because they may not be, then is there a civil claim? because there is a difference between in a harassment claim where the person is an employee versus a reporting who s coming to talk to him or something like that. but in this case, in california when you talk about the board of directors, california has very protective sexual harassment law. and as long as it is a supervisor who is doing the harassment and there was actual provable harassment, then the
every position except the supreme court. and sexual harassment. bill clinton dropping his pants and saying kits, suddenly they real. ited the we should roll some of the sexual harassment law. jesse jesse: what if they allow the wrongful death suits to go forward and kate steinle s family sues the pants off san francisco and mayor ed lee and some jiewry slaps the city with a judgment to the tune of $10 million, $20 million, $30 million, do you think that s a possibility? idea.ever heard anyone suggest i never heard anyone suggest that wp, but that s a great
every position except the supreme court. and sexual harassment. bill clinton dropping his pants and saying kits, suddenly they real. ited the we should roll some of the sexual harassment law. jesse jesse: what if they allow the wrongful death suits to go forward and kate steinle s family sues the pants off san francisco and mayor ed lee and some jiewry slaps the city with a judgment to the tune of $10 million, $20 million, $30 million, do you think that s a possibility? i never heard anyone suggest that, but that s a great idea. i never heard anyone suggest that wp, but that s a great