Intentionally helping this rich white man over these young girls who didn t have the kind of representation that the department of justice is ethically responsible and morally responsible to advocate for. you know, part of the issue to me is that there is we still don t have the full story. julie brown did amazing reporting. absolutely. acosta should answer questions. yes. i m all for the state s attorney answering questions, but we don t have an answer on why he was meeting offsite, why did he lie to the girls? why did he give immunity to these other four women plus persons known and unknown? why didn t he get anything in return for this deal? why didn t he research up in new york? i could give you a list of 30 things that he should have to respond to right away. and this business about, well, i think justice was done is a complete a, not true and b, unacceptable response from him at this time. it strikes me that here is a guy. he is currently sitting in the
Steele himself did not give this as isikoff and i report in our book, give this information to the fbi really until the fall of 2016 months into the russia investigation. so none of it holds up. yet we hear this time and time again, and you get the breitbart crowd and daily caller and everybody else out there banking on this investigation by the inspector general, but also banking on yet another investigation that bill barr, who is a little bit more politically minded here, is also trying to mount in the same way, all to prove that somehow this russian investigation was cooked up from the beginning and distracting us from the key issue, russia attacked the u.s. election, and donald trump and his campaign helped it along, encouraged it and benefitted from it. all right, david corn, thank you very much. thank you, chris. what happened inside the courtroom today is next.
The seth rich conspiracy theory and it slandered the name of a man who had been murdered, but it started in the bowels of the internet and worked its way up to the high-profile outlets and to the white house itself. let s start with the seth rich issue, jay, and the timeline here. is it possible that this whole russia narrative was and the leaks really came from a dnc staffer and that the media s been wrong for almost a year? well, sean, the media has not been right yet. the 27-year-old works for the dnc. he was shot in the back, murdered just two weeks ago for unknown reasons as he was walking down the street in washington. what are you suggesting? i m suggesting that our sources take risks. we re just two months shy of the one-year anniversary of seth rich s murder and ever since we learned rich was a dnc staffer, the conspiracy theories online have taken a life of their own, but today fox 5 as learned
Secretly with defense attorneys. when i was a prosecutor prosecuting sex crimes or police officers, i didn t defer to any defense counsel, and i don t know anybody who did. and these guys were deferential and would this be okay with you? it was a bizarre relationship that they had. but it s more than just sloppy. this is intentionally intentionally helping this rich white man over these young girls who didn t have the kind of representation that the department of justice is ethically responsible and morally responsible to advocate for. you know, part of the issue to me is that there is we still don t have the full story. julie brown did amazing reporting. absolutely. acosta should answer questions. yes. i m all for the state s attorney answering questions, but we don t have an answer on why he was meeting offsite, why did he lie to the girls? why did he give immunity to these other four women plus persons known and unknown? why didn t he get anything in return for this deal
Rule of law. what was the argument of that judge, and how did that go over today? so the argument is when congress passed its tax bill, it zeroed out the penalty for going without insurance. and everybody understood that what congress was doing was repealing the individual mandate. right. the president said so himself. but the red state attorneys general say ah-ha, congress left on the books a naked meaningless command to buy insurance, one that can t be enforced at all. and they say that command is unconstitutional. and because that command, which is backed up by no penalties at all is unconstitutional, the entire act has to fall. what is the position of the state of massachusetts, attorney general, on this? well, chris, it s great to be with you, though i m really sad to be here, because frankly, this issue should have been and was settled long ago. the supreme court already upheld the constitutionality of the affordable care act, and then congress went on to try to