Silenced your cell phones, and your completed speaker cards should be submitted to the clerk. Items acted upon today will appear on the october 29thd of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated. Id like to take item two first and then one and then three. So, mr. Clerk, could you please call item two. Item two is an ordinance amending the health and Business Code to replace the requirement that food preparations and Service Establishments post a symbol issued by the department of Public Health, and a placard indicating whether the establishment has conditionally passed or failed a health inspection. Clarifying some of the terminology pertaining to violations and penalties for same. And increasing permit fees for temporary permits and food vending machines. Thank you, mr. Clerk. This is supervisor peskins legislation, and we have calvin yang from his office to tell us about it. Thank you, chair mandelman. First i want to say my name is calvin, and im the legislative aide to to the supe
And to represent the nonew jail sf coalition. We heard from the sheriff there arent any alternatives except to send people out of county and thats not true. Theres a peoples vision to closing a 50 bryant and we will be going over that right now. And just a little bit of background, we are Community Organization and Community Members, folk whos are formally incarcerated people who sense 2015 hav2015 who have been calln the city of San Francisco to shut down at 50 bryant immediately. We represent more than 80 organizations and institutions that have united to demand the city take immediate steps to close a50 bryant. 850 bryant. At the core, its not just about closing but counseling the jailing in San Francisco by addressing the problem at its root through housing, Mental Health care and decriminalization. So first, we want to be responding to the mayors proposal to close 80 bryant and we appreciate this and were excited about the mayors investment in pretrial division. But there are a fe
We will have this chamber be a place where presenters can make a presentation and where members of the board can deliberate. We ask that folks sit down, if you could. Great. So where were we . Supervisor h araine . Y . In terms of the third option that was announced yesterday, do you have cap you provid ca sense of what that will involve and what the process is around that . I mean, if were talking about a new facility that is unclear what would be opening in 2030, what will happen between now and then . My understanding is if the hall of justice is closed and the count is where it is now, that well have to have some place for people go. Will you make that decision . What role will we have . A contract would come your way to approve. Part of what i was hoping to have is more of an indepth discussion of what the immediate next steps will be . So are you involved directly in coming up with what that plan will be or do you expect that will be the sheriffs view . This was announced yesterd
We heard from the sheriff there arent any alternatives except to send people out of county and thats not true. Theres a peoples vision to closing a 50 bryant and we will be going over that right now. And just a little bit of background, we are Community Organization and Community Members, folk whos are formally incarcerated people who sense 2015 hav2015 who have been calln the city of San Francisco to shut down at 50 bryant immediately. We represent more than 80 organizations and institutions that have united to demand the city take immediate steps to close a50 bryant. 850 bryant. At the core, its not just about closing but counseling the jailing in San Francisco by addressing the problem at its root through housing, Mental Health care and decriminalization. So first, we want to be responding to the mayors proposal to close 80 bryant and we appreciate this and were excited about the mayors investment in pretrial division. But there are a few aspects of the proposal that we are rejectin
A day when there were more questions than answers. Day when we thought that our country was and indeed what we thought was correct under assault. I remember the day because i was at work, and as the judge f a small claims Justice Court who was so moved by what was happening that we paused to sing god bless america. I remember at least one person sobbing. It was a day when people within that courtroom were faced with uncertainties unlike we had seen before. A day when all of our First Responders were challenged. Allow me, please, for just a moment to talk and say a few rds about those who were there at the site of the twin towers. Could see on television the cloud of dust as it started to emerge and settle. People rushing, bodies covered. It was intuitively obvious to the most casual observer that this was not a place to run to. As a matter of fact you would see people running away. But there were those who took their duties and responsibilities seriously. And as others were rushing awa