make that clear. there s no evidence of collusion. the republicans have been repeating that over and over and over again. do you think democrats first of all, i should get you to say whether or not you belief there is evidence of collusion, and do you think democrats are pushing a message on this front strong enough? there is evidence of collusion, kasie. just take the meeting at trump tower involving the president s son and son-in-law and campaign manager who were there on the promise with the expectation they would receive dirt from hillary clinton from a russian agent, so there is evidence of collusion in that meeting, in the guilty plea document involving george papadopoulos, and in various other very specific and public evidence,
i agree expanding t g7 to the g8 now a mistake, and you have to deal with russia and they are out there in syria, and there s no way i would agree to give them that legitimacy. the evil it represents is alive and well in russia. he s dismembering democracies everywhere, and he s trying to do so in our own backyard. i would stay tough on putin. it would be a mistake to try and get him back in the g8. jonathan swann, of all the things for the president to say at theg g7, why this? i have been trying to find out and frankly i don t know why. what i have been told, it was not part of any grand preparation or talk points or anything like that, so it took people by surprise.
vis-a-vis justin trudeau was not showing any signs of weakness in the face of the north korea summit? i don t think that s fair. just to set the picture, the g7, these are the most open countries in the world, average tariff rates of two to 3%, and the president goes in there swinging on the dairy products in canada, and it s an extremely sensitive thing for trudeau s party, and you try to tee it up ahead of time, and you say i need to mention the dairy issues and trudeau would say i understand that and i have to push back, and you try to do a little working this out ahead of time. instead of president barrels in there, and kinds of cuts loose on him and leaves. trudeau, who has his own political problems had to respond. does it make it look good for
how did rudy guiliani speaks about her, and it leaves open she does think maybe it happened. i loved it because it was so honest. no east wing is honest like that. amber, weigh in here. in some sense, and i have no idea if it was intentional, but this is a clap back to a man on trump s team that is using the president s playbook when he feels threatened by a woman to use gendered insults, and we saw that with mika, and carly fiorina, where he said look at her face, and it s a thing they do. rudy guiliani did that and i thought it was interesting to have those comments undercut, maybe intentionally or not, by melania trump. thank you so much for your time. the book is first in
doesn t really think about a whole lot. as well as the past. yes. as the president was extending this olive branch to the kremlin, his own director of national intelligence, dan coats, was saying exactly the opposite with a warning about continued russian interference at conference in normandy, he said, quote, russian actions are purposeful, premedicated and represent an all-out assault by vladimir putin on the rule of law. western ideals and democratic norms. coats went on to say, quote, the russians are actively seeking to divide our alliance and we must not allow that to happen. on one hand the president is saying it s fine they annexed crimea, that s fine, that s in the past. it seemed as the whole panel seems to agree, in the spur of the moment where it looks like