with the materials to get tailor made reagents from these microorganisms in the quarters most who are designed not to these are produced naturally and are more ecologically compatible so it can help reduce the need for harm for some static reagents. would. would also like to reduce the amount of water at least for the trusses you would force them on a horse and in my research the dream would be to no longer use flotation but to find a separation process that works in the dry state so we don t have the water problem that s something we re working on. making flirtation more environmentally friendly would have another important impact it could then be used to recycle products to recover the valuable minerals. present day treasure hunting has very much in whole spirit the big picture in mind.
seen in modern history. the demographics has changed so overall in the southwest border 65 to 70 percent of those that we apprehend that come across illegally our families and children. and because of the broken asylum laws that congress could fix we are forced to let those individuals into our country so to grab a child the u.s. passport in the country where mandated to let you go into the united states if you unaccompanied minor we are mandated to let you into the interior of the united states. and that the demographics we have right now. but we still do apprehend quite a few single adults that are trying to illegally enter the country as well. maria: what has changed in terms of the separation process? in terms of the separation process is nothing has changed as far as the separation process. if you are specifically talking about when we separate families is a very specific, ever since the zero tolerance policy, the executive order that came out and some judicial rulings that came
maybe one of the critical juncture points of the two-year long family separation process and that is because we knew about the 2800 kids that were separated and 2700 of those kids who were reunited during the zero tolerance period, but before that time, hhs, health and human service e the department responsible for the separated migrant earn which, their office of inspector general say there may be thousands more, potentially thousands who were separated before zero tolerance during a pilot program the trump administration ran in el paso up until the time zero tolerance started. it could be a thousand, 2,000, 3,000 and we don t know and that s the point of this whole thing. so now this judge has ruled that the trump administration needs to rule all of these kid, unknown number, thousands, into the larger class and then the next step will be determining who they are, where they are and ultimately on what happened to them. so how does this gives kids closure on being reunited with thei
anger over media coverage, saturday night live skits. a few hours later he touched on the issue of child separations at the border claiming the separation process was much worse under barack obama, warning at a that if people are not separated, more will come, and alleging that smugglers use kids. well, let s fact check that. first of all, president trump s claims that the current separation policy is better than that of the bush and obama administrations are simply not true. and the department of homeland security has never provided any proof when asked about smugglers using children to cross the border, despite the president repeatedly making this claim. what we have is 2,000 children who ve been separated from their parents between april and may, after then-attorney general sessions ordered prosecutors to pursue criminal charges against all migrants who cross the border illegally. in many cases, those parents have been deported back to their
shocking now as it could generally be. but it s because it s so deliberate. because the lies are in service to something so and some of his lies are victimless, right? some of them have victims. like his weight. he lied about his weight. some of them have victims. and some of the victims are 3-year-old kids. in this specific case, the protagonist of the 60 minutes episode was a 3-year-old, 4-year-old kid separated from his parents for like 70 days. the psychological harm caused in that separation process will be with that child for the rest of his life. the piece looks at a policy that was implemented without any due diligence to the morality, the psychology and politics of it. it was a top-down policy put in place designed as a deterrent cooked up in some weird lab as a deterrent for refugees and immigration and the victims are all little kids who will never be the same psychologically because of what they did. let me ask you the question i