Coming up live on cspan2 at 6 30 p. M. A conversation on human rights with the state departments undersecretary for civilian security, democracy and human rights. Shell discuss the work beingos5n done by the u. S. Atrocities prevention board which was created in 2012 to respond to and prevent genocide and other Human Rights Violations around the world. The council on Foreign Relations hosts the event. n8u4 tonight on American History tv programs on the 50th anniversary of the selma march. At 8 p. M. , selma 50th Anniversary Commemoration ceremony with president obama and one of the participants in that march, congressman john lewis. At 9 10 p. M. Abc news footage of march 25 1965 Voting Rights rally in montgomery alabama. After that president Lyndon Johnsons address to congress on Voting Rights. Then the selma 50th anniversary brown chapel ame church commemorative service. All of this coming up tonight on cspan3. Luy next, an update from this mornings washington journal on the future o
You can start dialing in now, or you can contact us via social media. You can make a comment on our Facebook Page. You can also send us an email. From the hill newspaper yesterday a new poll by abc news and the Washington Post. 57 say they support a president ial bid from every clinton in 2016. From Hillary Clinton in 2016. 68 approved of her work as secretary of state. 66 hold a favorable view of clinton after her department has faced criticism over the handling of benghazi and libya. Clinton also has heavy support in new york were 54 of registered voters say they would support a president ial bid by her in 2016. That is an the hill newspaper. We have lots of Facebook Comments already on this question. We want to share a couple of those with thieu. Jackie says she has my vote. Williams says i think she has been a great job for secretary of state but will not vote for her for president. Andy says hillary 2016. Military spouses against the wars says she will fit in perfectly with all of
Gross margin bottom will fall by half a percentage point. We will reverse the hardfought gains over the past few years. We cannot afford to go backwards. Instead we need a balanced and bipartisan approach. One that balances the short and longterm needs, distinguishes between Foreign Investments and the Core Investments that must be reserved, and spending that we can live without that utilizes both spending cuts and revenue increase. The first order of business should be to protect those middle income families i talked about and protecting them from a tax increase. The cbo estimates that simply extending the middleclass tax cuts would boost gdp by 1. 3 and create 1. 6 million jobs. Let me say that again boosted gdp by 1. 3 and create 1. 6 million jobs from that tax cut we can enact. It would resolve much of economic safety for these middleclass families. The wealthiest among us can help us reduce the debt by paying more. It is encouraging to see republican members of the house and the s
20,200 per year. He would earn enough to bring that family out of poverty. Not only would it put more hardearned money into the pockets of 28 million americans, many millions of them would be pulled out of poverty, it is also good for business. Let me tell you why. There is clear data that shows had the benefit of their of least turnover and more productivity. The minimum wage would generate an additional 19 billion in additional income for people who need it the most. The big difference between giving a raise and the minimum wage is instead of a tax break to the wealthy, they are living on the edge. Needed to pay their electric bill, put gas in the automobile, to find accessories. This generates Economic Growth in the communities. Companies big and small recognize these benefits. In atlantatly georgia and met the owner of a small advertising company. He independently raised the wages of his workers to 10. 10 per hour. Choosing the gap are to give their a ploy ease higher wages. Their
Access to 501 c 3 and 501 c 4 stacks extell status. Do you read that in the declaration of independence . I dont read that no it doesnt read that way. So its not really an explicit entitlement or right. Its a process you have to qualify for, is that correct . Correct. There are many different ways of trying to figure out how somebody qualifies, and whether they qualify, is that correct . Yes. And by and large, historically, irs has had a Standard Operating Procedure for determining those that status. Either 501 c 3 or 501 c 4 or other status. Is that correct . Correct. In this particular case, what were all excited about is that a filter was created in a Regional Office that seemed to target people for their political views, both right and left, but apparently mostly right. Is that right . They were as noted, inappropriate criteria used primarily 9 name of the organization to select them for further review. Now one of the problems with that here is an add verb. The word used in the sta