You just have to ask yourself this question, does it matter . Do we have unique perspectives, the unique voice of people who were born and raised in upstate new york, in the District Courts will that be will certainly Congress Edges becoming one of the group of democrats or a group of republicans were either individual voice will be totally lost. My supposition is green in congress we noticeable. National meet will pay attention. Talk to issues that matter to workers. Woolf if you walk down the street in elizabethtown and ask almost anybody theyre likely to know me. Thats not just because of my for congress. My family has been there since i did safety. As i said in my opening my fathers ashes are there. Ive been there in every season for years and years. I rebuilt my home there. The kind of work ive done to the 20 in a North Country sets me so part from a republican opponent. Community work, conservation work, helping to create jobs. It seems kind of come on glad matt was so openminded
Your attention between the need for a containment strategy to potentially may get worse, are you suggesting that that tips the balance to be unhealthy with Ground Troops with could be a positive thing or with the u. K. Involved is counterproductive . I dont see enough of the intelligence practice to judge the effects of manpower. I just know what i read in the papers. It is potentially doubleedged. But not necessarily read to have both positive and negative so with principal spinach and working in different ways. General entry believe ukase shed join United States and its allies to carry a strikes in syria of . Of the Legal Foundation is sound which i think they said it was then militarily it makes sense for the same purpose of a containment strategy to do that. You are aware that the current size and structure of the majestys armed forces are those structures of sufficient size to deal with a crisis such as the current one in the middle east . I would say the fact that were buying tho
By suggesting one. Chairman carper, youre recognized. Mr. Chairman, to you, our friend, Ranking Member cummings, to our colleagues with whom dr. Coburn and i have worked including the fellow from utah, most recently on really surplus property, access properties, wasted properties. I have a prepared statement im going to ask if we could be included in the record. Without objection. Both of your statements will be required we are not running a clock on you. This isnt the senate. Bear that in mind. [laughter] i like to think, first of all thank you for this thing. Thank you for giving us a chance to participate. Last year when we were new in our positions as Ranking Member and chair of the Homeland Security Government Affairs committee we invited both you and represented coming to come and bleed off are hearing on reform. Im courage to report today i think dr. Coburn and i have been working on bipartisan legislation. I think we are close to hammering out the final details. Report on the b
That was a significant of 30 , intended uses without the 40 reduction of the previous required instructions for use year of 1. 1 trillion. That the statute mandates. And the immediate effect, is it taking pressure off and things are improving. Things are improving in the near mr. Attorney general, there are lots of questions about the term. Part of the reason why the shooting at lax on friday. Deficit came down so what is the latest understanding significantly, receive news wept up 13 and spending wept down 2 last year. The combination of those two of the investigation . Resulted in the deficit coming down. Do you think any things could the difficulty is that while have been done to stop this in thats a good sign in the near the future . Term, all projections because of the investigation is underway and part of that investigation the demographics are going will be a review of the security measures that were in place not forward, all projections only at lax but also a review of indicate
George h bushs presidency. It is about an hour. Delightful to join many in celebrating the 25th anniversary of the presidency of george w. Bush. George h. W. Bush. This panel will focus on Environmental Impact and i am delighted to be joined by two people who played pivotal roles in the passage of that gradyon, bob brady and senator alan simpson. We are going to try to do three things in this panel. First, we are going to pose the act,ion, did the clean air in practice over the last 15 years, fulfill the promise and intent of its creators . We often, in public policy, and up end up making claims about what will happen if we do x or y. But it is constructive, among other things, to go back and see if the promises that were being made about its proponents actually occurred. Atare secondly going to look the way in which the Clean Air Act was fashioned within the executive branch and the proposal that was developed before president bush sent it to congress. Third, you are going to look at