was the fact that over 100,000 documents related to judge kavanaugh have been characterized by the chairman of the committee as confidential. i ve been a member of this committee for a number of years. committee confidential documents have been really limited to extraordinary circumstances as an example, if someone is accused of taking drugs during the course of an investigation and i m not making any suggestion that this is even the case or close to it here, it was done in a confidential setting. in fairness to the nominee and the same thing on duis and the like. we used an extremely rare circumstances where we would meet after this committee hearing and sit down and it usually related to a handful of pages or a handful of document references. instead what we found now is that we re seeing hundreds of thousands of documents characterized as committee confidential unilaterally. its not done a bipartisan basis, its being done by the chairman. one of the discussions yesterday was this wh
one of the issues with were documents considered as confidential. i ve been a committee confidential documents are limited to extraordinary circumstances. if someone is accused of taking drugs during the course of an investigation, i m not making a suggestion that s even the case or close to it here. it was done in a confidential setting in fairness to the nominee. the same thing on duis and the like. we used an extremely rare circumstances where we would meet after the committee meeting and sit down and usually related to a handful of pages or document references. instead what we found now is that we re seeing hundreds of thousands of documents characterized as committee confidential unilaterally. it s being done by the chairman. one of the discussions yesterday was the whole question of whether this committee is going to hear a nominee for a lifetime appointment to the highest court in the land without
related to judge kavanaugh have been characterized by the chairman of the committee as committee confidential. i have been a member of the committee for a number of years. committee confidential documents have been really limited to extraordinary circumstances. as an example, if someone is accused of taking drugs during the course of an investigati investigation i m not making any suggestion that is even the case or close to it here it was done in a confidential setting, and fairness to the nominee. same on duis and the like. we use an extremely rare circumstances, where we d meet after this committee hearing and sit down, and it usually related to a handful of pages or handful of document references. instead, what we found now is we are seeing hundreds of thousands of documents characterized as committee confidential unilaterally. it is not done on a bipartisan basis. it is done by the chairman. one of the discussions yesterday was this whole question of whether this committee is
fears that things could be just that bad. nicely here in traverse city, we have lake michigan to cool off in as so many are. but you get a sense as you watch people walking around like festivals like these all over the country that certainly, law enforcement here and the paramedics have definitely brought up their game in trying to hand out water bottles and keep people hydrated in this. and you have to think if we re seeing hundreds of thousands of protesters out around the country, you have to think of people keeping themselves hydrated because it s an intense debate and people feel passionate and they re showing up. we ll be covering it for the rest of our show coming up. we ll bring you the latest from rally across the country opposing president trump s immigration policies. plus much more from traverse city, michigan. leland: it s going to be great. we ll take you down to the city s vibrant main street and talk to small business owners about the state of the economy and how they
this is a fox news alert. as you know, we re covering a number of rallies across the country and across the globe. you re looking at live pictures, that s here in washington d.c., pennsylvania avenue. as you know, houston, chicago, new york city, all seeing hundreds of thousands of people descend upon the streets. they re protesting for a number of issues, but most obviously the march for our lives rally. it s become somewhat of an anti-gun rally. i want to check with peter doocy on the ground here in d.c. with the very latest. hi peter. and liz, march for our lives is, from what we ve been seeing, a march against of the n.r.a. and against republican lawmakers and against president trump. you can see there are still a ton of people coming, even though there really is no way to get close to the stage.