sondland never mentioned this other call. i believe in his testimony, he said he couldn t remember there were one or two calls with him and the president. but correct me if i m wrong, he never mentioned this other call at the dinner that now that ambassador taylor referenced one of his aides heard. that s right. what s so interesting is you have the president saying well, i really don t know much about the gentleman, except that he gave this gentleman his personal cell phone number and evidently ambassador sondland has him on speed dial. there was probably at least six phone conversations that they had. it s also for a candidate like for president trump, who as a candidate was very upset about the security violations or, you know, the security standards of secretary clinton, to be using a cell phone in a restaurant in ukraine of all places, that sort of violates every norm of trying to keep secrets from your
we hear this now, third, fourth, fifth-hand. first of all, hearsay is like circumstantial evidence. and in most crimes, it s circumstantial evidence that actually solves the crime. and we also have this summary of the president s phone conversation, and then we have his actions afterwards. and now we evidently have mr. sondland talking to the president in which the president says how about the investigation. so it s pretty straight forward. sondland never mentioned this other call. i believe in his testimony, he said he couldn t remember there were one or two calls with him and the president. but correct me if i m wrong, he never mentioned this other call at the dinner that now that ambassador taylor referenced one of his aides heard. that s right. what s so interesting is you have the president saying well, i really don t know much about the gentleman, except that he gave this gentleman his personal cell phone number and evidently ambassador sondland has him on speed dial. the
laura: they should all be prosecuted. 600 security violations on the clinton email server criminal prosecutions. laura: the kavanaugh leak. no prosecutions. there were 27 active investigation into leaks just related to trump. i think there s only been one prosecution. laura: this is where the justice department and bill barr have to step up and start making sense of this. this is u.s. tax dollars at work, and our civil liberties, our entire representative democracy is on the line. we have one president. we don t have more branches of government than the three that our framers laid out in the constitution. gentlemen, thank you so much tonight. coming up, a clinton insider offering a warning to 2020 democrats about his parties lurch to the radical left, and did you know that new york city this is bill de blasio is actually paying his homeless to move to different cities around the country. dr. drew pinsky is here to tell us where they are going next. billions of mouths.
issues. that same committee, this new church committee, if you wills. should be looking at the use of the whistle-blower laws and tightening that up, because there are legitimate reasons to facilitate whistle-blowing, butr you can t use it as a political cudgel, as a political weapon and that is what we are seeing here. a very clever use of the whistle-blower laws and gettingt around, sort of, some of these people who have a political agenda. laura: you have been involved in a lot of the foia requests to get information. horowitz is looking at, durham is clearly looking at, do you expect we will learn a lot moree about these deep state actors and their agenda to take around this president, from horowitz specifically? i think the question is that they will follow up on it. agencies have this casual approach to criminal leaks. you had comey leaking, mccabe leaking. laura: they should all be prosecuted. 600 security violations on the clinton email server
york times reported that donors are asking about hillary getting into the race because they don t think these guys have what it takes. here s the thing. she did win the popular vote. she could run against trump s record hand she wouldn t have a problem raising money. she s still crooked, she matches up terribly against donald trump and the rest of the party is not behind her. it will be an absolute mess if she jumps in. greg: it will be great. i have to agree with jesse. shocking. she s still crooked. the state department came out saying no persuasive evidence of systemic deliberate mishandling of classified e-mail. that is just so specific. so what she s ignorant then? they did said there were hundreds of security violations. 588. either she s ignorant and clueless or a terrible leader and are her underlings do her