The professor believes that he could bring suit if he thought the speaker of the house assumed the roll of commander in chief. The point here is not who was the better reading on this particular question of whether theres an implicit Transition Authority to smooth the transition to the new requirements. The critical fact that this is mere lay debate about the best way of construing legislation and the house has no legal interest in that. Now, whatever the right answer. This may be an important matter in terms of extending health care to 25, or 30 million americans and making sure the business has time to comply with the new requirements that this business desired and as i believe this house overwhelmingly supports. Thats what this transition is carrying out. Whatever the right answer to that question, i think its safe to say that never in our history has such a radical change in the role of the Judicial Branch been proposed to deal with such a routine question of administrative process
Rate of improving Unemployment Rate and what that says about our economy. Youve talked about that both in your policy report and your written statement here today and your oral statement you said the Unemployment Rate has fallen nearly 1. 5 rates over the past year. It stood at 6. 1 . The gentleman will suspend. The clerk is having a little trouble hearing if you could speak closer to the microphone. Much has been said about the Unemployment Rate fallen 4 points from the height. My concern is that these government numbers dont seem to distinguish between full time employment and part time employment. If the gentleman would suspend one more time. Would you mind using the microphone adjacent to you and lets see if that corrects the problem . Is that better . Perhaps the microphone for mr. West mooreland might work. Lets try this . Okay. Chairman in march you gave a speech about what the fed is doing to tackle the Unemployment Rate. You made this observation. This is a quote, the existenc
Certainly makes you think about it very carefully and watching the film on women and womens right is what is this reconciliation all about. And that is about an afghanistan that works with the rule of law and that supports the rights and responsibilities of all citizens, but particularly women. On the questions of reconciliation im sure they are still high on the administrations agenda but the principles remain very much the same. The second point you asked me to talk about our the elections. Hes done a wonderful job on that. Two things that are important to me. One is what is the outcome here and it is an election that is seen by most afghans as legitimate and a leader as someone they can say here is someone we can support Going Forward into second being appointed ambassador made that the United States has no favorites and has no candidates in this and the election is a matter for the people of afghanistan. They will choose the future leaders. The final point on that is a good questio
A and that action has cost us dearly. It has cost all of us dearly. And so i believe that the investments that we have planned to continue building afghanistans economy, to continue building its capacity of its people and to continue to set it on a path for its own self sustainability is a critical opportunity that now more than ever we have to recommit too. Thank you. [applause] thank you all. Were trying to pack a lot in todays we dont have much time for question and answer, but i think we have about 15 minutes where we can take some questions from the audience. We have microphones that can be handed out, if you identify yourself. I would make a plea to keep your questions or comments short so that we a time for as many people to as questions as possible. So please identify yourself. We will start there, close to the microphone. I think probably afghanistan is the only democracy where there are no Political Parties which are so crucial for any democracy. So why it didnt happen when t
The department that there will be continuity and persistence rather than ad hoc efforts . Yes. And i think that although they werent as prominent, there were at least a half dozen other botnet takedowns in the last couple of years between core flood and game over zeus so theres definitely its definitely a priority and a focus and theres a lot of knowledge among the prosecutors and their counter parts at the fbi about the botnets, and they will keep coming and we will keep attacking them. Yeah. I yield to my Ranking Member but my impression was that some of those were sort of sporadic and ad hoc takedowns that appeared in individual u. S. Attorneys offices and not necessarily consistent with a continuing, lasting, persistent presence stripping down one botnet after another an im glad youve gotten to where you have gotten so thank you. Senator graham . Are you the eliot ness of botnets . I think hes the eliot ness of bot nets. Okay. You try to deter the behavior, make people think if i d