Susan Harold Holzers is our second hour about your new book the president s versus press. While i invite people to find the first hour, for those who havent seen it, whats that the jist of your new book . Mr. Holzer the thesis is we may believe we are living through the most chaotic and unpleasant confrontational era ever between a president and the media. But in fact, its a long tradition in American Government and American Media history that president s and the press do not share the same interests and have been out war, and a sense, ever since george washington. Susan from the time you started this project, was it always it versus the press . Mr. Holzer im glad you asked. No. Originally it was the president s and the press. In my research about president kennedy, i found that he gave a very defensive speech in 1961 for the American Publishers Association in new york city. And during the speech he said, i wanted to call this speech the president versus the press because you are not a
Know about his sons business dealings in ukraine. He is backpedaling on that. Twitter and facebook now accused trying to suppress this news. The fireworks on the final day of questioning for judge Amy Coney Barrett as democrats remained outraged that they failed at blocking her. Senator Kamala Harris and democrats trying to delegitimatize judge barrett for refusing to discuss her personal views on policies while democrats led by senator harris refused to discuss how they want to delegitimatize the Supreme Court via ideas like Court Packing. Remember, Nancy Pelosis ice cream in the freezer moment while 30 million lost their jobs during the pandemic . Remember nancy pelosi blaming a little hair salon after pell lows got caught getting a blow out there during shutdowns. Pelosi with blow back trying to shut down wolf bitter, why she is freezing up covid19 relief. Doj probe ended Obama Administration of unmasking of individuals like general Michael Flynn, the controversies have only just be
News cribber john solomon are here, joining me in the you 8 0. Earnings season rolling of on. Big banks on deck this morning. All the numbers as soon as they hit the tape and impact on markets. Broader markets pointing to a gain at the start of trading, dow industrials up 84, nasdaq up 28, the s p 500 up 10 o 10 poin. Yesterday stocks were sluggish over weak Quarterly Earnings and halted covid19 vaccine trials. At the end of the day, the s p 500 was lower by 22. Shiny now apple, the Technology Giant unveiling four new iphone 12s ss for your convenience. Coping tips from outer space, astronauts have isolation advice for the weary public and its making a buzz this morning. Mornings with maria is live right now. European markets in the green, take a look. The fq100 up 14, the cac is up 1 andahalf and the dax index higher by 15, fractional moves this morning in europe but to the upside. A mixed story overnight in asia, as chinese president xi jinping is calling for young People Living in h
Can you comment sen. Graham on what you said this morning. Sen. Graham anybody who was listening to who i am and what i said, you know that it was a deep sarcasm that i suggested that some legislative body would want to yearn for the good old days of segregationism. The point im trying to make is that there is nobody in the legislative arena wanting to take us back to the dark time in american history. For my opponent to suggest that, it says far more about him than me. I have been a United States senator for three terms. I represent a state with 31 africanamerican population. I want to make sure that everybody in my state moves forward. In terms of that statement, it blows my mind that any rational person could believe that about me. This is not a game we are playing here with the people of South Carolina. There are plenty of differences between my opponent and myself. Manufacturing a scenario that Lindsey Graham wants to go back to the days of segregation is not worthy of the times i
Muzzled here. People wanted to do that for years. This phase in the hearing is complete and we now move to several closeddoor sessions and tomorrow morning, there will be a meeting of the judiciary in attee on the next step public panel will be part of it, then ultimately there will be a vote of the full committee i assume next week on this nomination. In my observations are these, we should not be here. We should not be holding the Committee Meeting in the midst of an election. This is the first time this has ever happened in the history of the United States that a Supreme Court nomination has been considered in the midst of an election. It is a desperate attempt by oconnell and President Trump to fill a vacancy at a time when we should be taking our time, assessing the nominee, and doing it in an orderly fashion and as the American People have said, it should be done by the next president. We should not be here. The hearing itself lasted several days has been conducted in a fair mann