While everyone reached a general agreement on most of the players under consideration 31 of the 43 were ranked two or fewer spots apart by the two groups there were a few whom we are more bullish on, or some for whom the community sees more promising futures. In this article, we’ll look at six of the most significant gaps to be found in the results, with the voting broken down to get a clear picture of how each player is regarded.
The table below separates the rankings of the two groups (11 members of the staff, and 421 ballots from the community, including the two representatives who served on our panel for the series), for a simple comparison of the rankings. You can sort the columns to see each group’s order (with the actual average used to determine the lists in parentheses), and click a player’s name to go to his T25U25 profile.