Decisions to make. Theres were not trying to force people into it or anything like that. But we certainly are encouraging those members that we know have skills and the capabilities to contribute to do so. You said that Coalition Allies will be sending several hundred additional trainers to iraq. But that number didnt make sense to me because thats pretty much what the pentagon is going to send over there are you saying 700 plus what the pentagon sends . Yes. On a have allies agreed cap, like this much and no snr not that im aware of, but you have to speak over the individual nation what theyre willing to contribute and not willing to contribute. You said the pentagon will be training 12bury gadse. Coalition members will be assisting us at the in this training, 12 total. No surprise, britain training some troop out there randomly . I can only speak for the United States military. What i can tell you on this mission, its a coalition mission. So 12bury gadse is the is 12 brigades is the
Fascinates you, mark. So why do you think this is so cosmically important . Three reasons, first of all it gives permission for other people who like and respect mitt romney, who worked for him before, as dave did, it gives them permission to say, if dave can do it, they can do it. It gives jeb bush an a campaign manager. And finally, this is a guy who know thousands win in iowa. People who think jeb bush might skip iowa or doesnt need to do well in iowa are wrong. This gives jeb bush a better chance, even though candidates matter more than staff, to win iowa. Something implicit in your comment, this isnt just hes got dave cotchel to go do iowa. Hes bringing on dave in a role at the pack. Campaign manager. National campaign manager. National campaign manager. Huge deal. Dave is a great guy. National press likes him. Hes got good relationships throughout the political world. He does, as you said, put jeb in a position to compete, if not make him the frontrunner in iowa. Theres not going
You think this is so cosmically important . Three reasons, first of all, it gives permission for other people who like and respect mitt romney who worked for him before, as dave did it gives them permission to say, if dave can do it, they can do it pt and he it gives jeb bush an a campaign manager. And finally, this is a guy who know thousands win in iowa. People who think jeb bush might skip iowa or doesnt need to do well in iowa are wrong. This gives jeb bush a better chance, even though candidates matter more than staff, to win iowa. Something implicit in your comment, this isnt just hes got dave cotchel to go do iowa. Hes bringing in dave on n a role at the pack. Campaign manager. National campaign manager. National campaign manager. Huge deal. Dave is a great guy. National press likes him. Hes got good relationships throughout the political world. He does, as you said, put jeb in a position to come pete if not make him the frontrunner in iowa. Theres not going to be a frontrunner
Morning. Five banks have been hit with major fines. Kayla tousche joins us on set with some of the details. This is the settlement weve been speccing for weeks, for months. An 18month investigation by authorities in the uk as well as the uk as well as switzerland have announced a joint settlement with five banks, urging them to pay more than 3 billion to settle charges of key Foreign Exchange rates in the 4 00 hour is when most of the activity, according to the press releases, happened. Its going to be a costly one for many of these banks. Ubs will pay the most at about 800 for a threeway settlement. The cftc in the u. S. And the federal authority, as well. Citibank will pay 668 million to the fca and the cftc as that Bank Adjusted earnings by 600 million just a few weeks ago as it was setting aside more money for this settlement. Jp morgan chase will pay the two u. S. And uk regulators. Hsbc, 618 million. Even though these are pretty big sticker numbers, guys, it does seem like pretty
So, unfortunately im constrained in what i can say, of course, about it. But what i can say is as in the Amnesty International case and in the Supreme Court, its plaintiffs burden to demonstrate and they failed to do so here, not only because their theory as subscribers of Verizon Wireless, which they cannot substantiate the District Court acknowledged theres no evidence that Verizon Wireless participated, but also because the injury that they assert is not based on the mere collection of metadata itself but the possibility that the government metadata to that compile information about the acvities of these particular plaintiffs. If there is an invasion of privacy by the collection of the metadata and the Supreme Court in jones recognizes even in the opinion of the court that it is the protected interest under the Fourth Amendment, then is it necessary that they show any misuse against them or is the collection by itself an invasion of privacy sufficient to meet that element of standin