help, some peacekeepers, to keep people from tearing each other appear in a score settling that will follow assad s departure. but it s not as if we don t know what to do. the plan is straightforward. understood basically by the whole world. what s preventing it from happening is russia sitting on its hands. saying it supports it but not doing anything about it. and i think people need to be more specific and emphatic in saying, this russian behavior is just inappropriate when people are dying in the gruesome ways that people were killed last friday in hula. richard haass? well let me ask a question of dr. brzezinskbrzezinski. what about them essentially telling the russians, you have to choose between a responsible policy towards syria and relations with us? what about raising the stakes for moscow? i don t think the russians will be terribly impressed by that.
and more of a this is somebody protecting their husband, protecting the image of her husband. i read this book. she wanted him to go more aggressive. it was more aggressive sometimes in messaging. more aggressive in what you are not feeling as if the way they were going about it, which was going the back room way which was, of course, the rahm influence. this book has really exposed, you know, it s being framed as the east wing versus the west wing. the pivotal player here is valerie jarrett who i think is being somebody who is brought in in remember when she was brought in in the faufl 07 as the eyes and ears of michelle obama. and that s the the tension has been there with the senior folks who went from the campaign to the white house. that tension never went away. whatever happened here it never went away. what you are seeing in this book is a little bit of score settling, which, in talking to other people about who i think talked to jodi cantor admit this doesn t look go
went away. what you are seeing in this book is a little bit of score settling, which, in talking to other people about who i think talked to jodi cantor admit this doesn t look good. they all made a pact they weren t going to do this. explain to the public why it matters there s been this friction, this fight between the chief of staff and first lady. why is it important? it shows the first lady, and certainly a different light than she s been in so far. it shows her very involved with this white house. very much the keeper of this the flame of obama. so i think that s why it s important. i think it might get some spin on the different networks showing her as more of a co-president as maybe too powerful. she doesn t want to be a hillary clinton in that regard? this is nancy reagan and hillary clinton. it s the same so reasonable. spouses look out for your spouse. they are partners. if it wasn t the case, you d wonder about their marriage. it would be weirder.
think? well, i don t know what s going on. the one thing predictable about new hampshire is that it s unpredictable. my sense is that mitt romney is going to do well here. it s a multicandidate race. you have a lot of candidates here who work very hard and committed a lot of time. it s not surprising that the numbers would be divided and spread across four or five major candidates. the fact that mitt romney is running as well as he is a plus for him and other candidates seem to be grouped 10 to 13 points behind him. he did take a lot of shots at the debate yesterday morning. you had written this in that article i mentioned. my guess is that this may backfire on them. most new hampshire voters are not interested in the personal attacks. they are focused on the issues especially how to get the economy going and get the nation s debt under control. candidates who depart from addressing these concerns to delve into score settling do so at considerable risk to their
how she wanted to go more aggressive on health care? more in messaging and what you re not feeling as if the way they were going about it, which was going the back room way, which was the wrong influence. but this book is really exposed. it s being framed as the east wing versus the west wing. but someone who was brought in remember when she was brought in in the fall of 07 as the eyes and ears of michelle obama. this tension has been there with the senior folks who went from the campaign to the white house. that tension never went away. whatever happened, it never went away. what you re seeing in the book is score settling, which in talking to other people who talked to jo day canter, says it didn t look good. explain it to the public. why it matters that there s been this fight between the chief e of staff and first lady.