which was, oddly, congresswoman debbie wasserman schultz s office in sunrise, florida. of course she didn t send that package. the exact same return address, we should note, was used for clinton s and obamas packages. devices were also sent to democratic congresswoman maxine waters on capitol hill. they re still trying to figure out if it s tied to these other incidents, as well as one sent to liberal billionaire and philanthropist george soros and to cnn s headquarters where it was addressed to john brennan, former cia director. this is the device that was sent to the time warner center. as i said, it was addressed to president obama s cia director, john brennan, a vocal critic of president trump. now the packages are being described as rudimentary but operative explosive devices, leading investigators to fear the intent was to kill and to kill a lot of people. no, thankfully, none of the devices went off and while we don t know the suspect or his or her or their motive, law enforc
Of the national rhetoric. i also think that it s, with the internet, it s easier to get access to the materials and the technology, if that s the right term, on how to build these devices. and whoever did this is somewhat sophisticated because apparently knows if you send it to a congressional office, it s screened, but if you send it to a home address, it s not. and also using debbie wasserman-schul wasserman-schul wasserman-schultz s return address, she s the past campaign leader of the democratic campaign committee in the house. so, you know, and obviously she s not behind this, so whoever is behind it is showing some knowledge of the systems and the processes in washington. that the average citizen probably wouldn t have. congressman joe barton of texas, thanks again for being