into the partisanship probably in september or october. this just seems like something that was always going to happen. so congratulations on the sausagemaking in getting this massive infrastructure bill thing through. but this isn t even controversial. can i just add one piece of evidence to back up your point on the politics of this and where the republican party is in particular? only one republican who s going to face voters next time voted yes, lisa murkowski. all the others even though some of them were at the table at the beginning like todd young, backed out. and they backed out because the former president decided that this is something that he was going to make as a litmus test, don t vote for something that is a joe biden priority. and that has resonance within the republican base, which is why they voted no. and the partisanship has already started. mitch mcconnell said that everything they re going to do from here on out is going to be trying to defeat biden s agenda.
piece of legislation into law. he s going to work his heart out getting both of them across the finish line. so the white house is not going to say, yes, he will sign the infrastructure bill if it comes alone to his desk? the president expects to sign each piece of legislation into law. this is really silly. it s a little tedious. it s all about the sausagemaking of this deal. listen, he will sign it when it comes across his desk. if it s first, you know, if the reconciliation bill is three days later or five days later or ten days later, who knows. they laid out a pretty perfect sharo that both of these bills will perfectly land on the president s desk at exactly the same time and the sequencing in the house and the senate will be great. unlikely because of what we know about congress. i think they re just trying not to stiff-arm progressives who don t, you know, are nervous about the process of this reconciliation bill. but why are they so worried about progressives if it i
people want the truth, the information out there, and opening it all up. the reality is republican stopped the release of the democratic memo last week. there were votes against releasing the democrat memo by republicans, this is another vote, this is where we get into the reads and the sausagemaking, and a partisan process to support an effort to damage the investigation because they are getting too close to the president and his relationship with russia. rob: we lost charlie in the midst of that but there is a debate to be had there and we got it started this morning and it will be getting a lot more of it. over to you. we get to hear the 911 call.
by megyn kelly, the email in her hands, she still was denying that happened. whoever is sitting at the table, can they be trusted? all opinions on board steve says the seat at the table obama provided the republicans when he said elections have consequences? email from john, they just want to be there to keep president obama s legacy going, no way they want to work with trump. laura: no seat at trump s table for them, it is the people s table. heather: 7 there will be deals made, sausagemaking in washington is difficult but you don t have to go in saying what republicans have done for so long as unilaterally surrender, let s give away campaign
they are committed to something that it may not work, it may take months or even years, but the result is the stabilization almost by accident. i think that s a tough spot for president obama. we ve seen the sausagemaking in the last two weeks and almost been like having a president who isn t a commander in chief but commander in confusion. at times it seems like dr. jekyll and mr. hyde. assad must go, there is a red line, then the next moment he s vacillating and trying to do anything but what he has said. what we ve also seen for the first time is a congress abandon him including some of his staunchest supporters in the democratic party. you ve seen people like the