I would remind members of the public to please silent your mobile devices that may sound off during these proceedings. I will take a role at this time. [roll call] first on your agenda is general public comment. I have no speaker cards. Any member of the public wish to address the commission . Closed public comment. Department matters, director announcements. No announcements. Review of planning Staff Commission report and announcements. Is the Planning Commission on recess . Sorry, still none. [laughter] okay. Commission matters president s report and announcements. No report. Consider ration of adoption drive minutes for the july 17, 2019 regular hearing. Any member of the public wish to comment on our draft minutes from july 17 . Okay. Closed public comment. I move they be approved. Second. On that motion to adopt the minutes for july 17. [roll call] cell moved. The Motion Commission comments and questions, item number five. V. P. Matsuda after our july 17, 2019 hearing, i received
Is a variety of mitigations that are required that are similar to the ones here. The process has been slightly refined to point out what youre saying, which is that if the project does not meet the standards, but it does retain some elements in this additional mitigation. We refined it a little bit to make it clearer since we have the retained elements in draft form, that would be one of the documents we can utilize from the staffs review and from project sponsors to have an understanding about what we mean by that. Does not help clarify . With a project like that come before the commission, there are many projects that are Historic Resources that have to go through the eir process, often, almost all the time that comes before the arc. Would that be a similar thing. Of her project was going through that, if its not going through an eir process because this is here but then it will not be seen because its administrative. Thats correct. They are not going through the fall or process and
This time. roll call . First on the agenda is general public conduct. The general public may address the commission except agenda items. The opportunity will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting. You may address the commission for up to three minutes. I have one speaker card. We will start with georgia. Good afternoon. Thank you. I have learned that your survey is on the three year timetable, not two. I am here today because i want to refer to the mary brown sunset study. Her recommendation on page 118, which is conduct a focused Evaluation Survey of battle front mediterranean houses in the sun set district. There were few examples of this type of property in the survey area, it is the most commonly and uniform constructed style in the mid 1920s. By 1931 that style was gone. I have a particular interest in that because, one, i live across the street from an original from 1927. I think that statement from her study has application for the eastern neighborhoods as you go f
Is the Planning Commission on recess . Sorry, still none. [laughter] okay. Commission matters president s report and announcements. No report. Consider ration of adoption drive minutes for the july 17, 2019 regular hearing. Any member of the public wish to comment on our draft minutes from july 17 . Okay. Closed public comment. I move they be approved. Second. On that motion to adopt the minutes for july 17. [roll call] cell moved. The Motion Commission comments and questions, item number five. V. P. Matsuda after our july 17, 2019 hearing, i received a phone call from supervisor ronans office regarding the motion to include the wolsey project on our landmark designation. If there is nothing else, we can move on to your consent calendar. It is considered to be routine by the Historic Preservation commission and may be acted upon by single roll call. There will be no separate discussion of this item unless a member of the commission public, or staff so requests. Item six, 20181321, at 7
Good afternoon. Thank you. I have learned that your survey is on the three year timetable, not two. I am here today because i want to refer to the mary brown sunset study. Her recommendation on page 118, which is conduct a focused Evaluation Survey of battle front mediterranean houses in the sun set district. There were few examples of this type of property in the survey area, it is the most commonly and uniform constructed style in the mid 1920s. By 1931 that style was gone. I have a particular interest in that because, one, i live across the street from an original from 1927. I think that statement from her study has application for the eastern neighborhoods as you go forward with your survey. I hope it is considered. Mediterranean revival is predominant per the page report for certain and maybe in other neighborhoods. Particularly, the battle front style is unique because it was just built in the very narrow window of time, and like the whole revival is a unique style to San Francis