To provide 08 offstreet residential, [speaker not understood], three retail. 80 unless theyre willing to come up with a couple commercial and car share instead. Commissioners, for clarity, there is a motion and second on the floor. I havent heard the maker of the motion nor the seconder support this amendment. I could get a second for the amendment. We would have to deal with the original motion and the second first, and then we can move on to another motion if that motion fails. Ill hear what the developer has to say. My preference would be 80, three retail, three tenants or more. And then one car share. Id be happy to increase that car share to 83 and 2. For a total of 85. [inaudible]. Okay. I mean well defer it to the maker of the motion to see what would work for the maker of the motion to try to make this realistic. Id hate to see the project fail because we dont have enough parts and go nowhere because we cant sell the unit. It doesnt make any sense. Mr. Junius, youre a land use
Our network. So, what has happened is we have decided to place three wifi sites in the center of two macro sites to pull off the capacity from those macro sites that are overloaded right now to serve our customers better. There is a lot of community. There is a lot of stuff going on on the fillmore corridor. It is amazing to see, to be part of it. But its also creating a lot of people to congregate in one spot, putting a lot of, a lot of pressure on the network. And, so, were doing this in response to that capacity that were seeing. We did hold Community Meetings. We held three separate Community Meetings and those are actually in your packets as the people who attended. Im happy to have conversations with these two gentlemen and anybody else who would like to have conversations with us. Were happy to offer to go out and test his house, his deck, whatever he would like that would give him a comfort to show that the Different Levels of emf are in the 60 limit and b likely from the Wifi