The Tax Policy Center's conclusion is the result of a series of carefully made choices, which cause them to arrive at their selected result. This finding is harming the debate on tax reform.
messina and axelrod were laying out, i think they need to redefine a few words and one is mandate. we have a humandate. a lot of other people who weren t white men voted for barack obama and they have things they want and that includes taxes on the very wealthy. the republican party doesn t recognize those people you just referred to. jared, isn t speaker boehner simply reiterating the romney tax plan that basically expands revenue with a magic formula of growth and cutting loopholes that no economist as intelligent as you would ever find believable? to some extent he is, and one of the things you have to be very wary as your question suggests is any tax plan that bases its revenue projections on the magic asterisk of something called dynamic scoring or supply side growth effects, and that says you cut tax rates and you get big gdp growth rates and, of course, history has been extremely unkind. what you do get is larger budget
it s not happening right now and that is the questio to be upon data. it sssing the romney tax plan is to attack the taxf@ a bunch of communist. gold research for congressional four members of congressally eople and wds to economic growth. that report coming out and the senate republicans say they want it rescinded. they don t like beca says. the unemployment rate drops to 8%. people decide it isn t below 8%.abor must be full of a bunch of communists and theorists that the polling clearly showed president obama not just winning nationally but president obama winning in all o states that were going to put together the victory that you theyhat they were going to re-elect oll be the answer ery idea ssues and that ss, frankly, when the news cycle. bue the election, i do not believe that there is do not believe that a way that is observable and tru checkable and we all follow that, even when we don t lik
people back to work. that s why i put in a five-point plan that gets america 12 million new jobs in four year. governor romney doesn t have a five-point plan. he has a one-point plan. that s been his philosophy as a presidential candidate. president obama was noticeably looser and more aggressive than the first debate. at one point saying romney is offering the american people, i quote, a sketchy deal. governor romney was a very successful investor. if somebody came to you, governor, with a plan that said, here, i want to seven 7 or $8 trillion and we re going to pay for it, but we can t tell you until after the election how
i think one of the dominating characteristics of this debate, chris, were some of the errors that mitt romney gave. i think he did a fine performance, but turnovers kill you in championship games. he had three turnovers tonight. yes. let s go to this one. from the start we saw a different president tonight than the man who showed up two weeks ago. let s take a look at how he challenged romney on his i love this one. this is my favorite of the night actually. the five-point plan that was condensed to one point by the president. governor romney says he s got a five-point plan. governor romney doesn t have a five-point plan. he has a one-point plan. and that plan is to make sure that folks at the top play by a different set of rules. that s been his philosophy in the private sector. that s been his philosophy as governor. that s been his philosophy as a presidential candidate. you can make a lot of money and pay lower tax rates than somebody who makes a lot less. you can ship jobs o