Submit it for the record. I appreciate i knew that, 1 might be the result. The second is your proposed rule creates an actual date on the u calendar. Date we entered world war i but as you nanknow, our archival l ahpduqano y ir t hahp hc archives actually right now. Im sure thats one of them. In general, sir, what i mn will say inco date was to reallywu w4 possible. If we establish th certainly many of our veterans owe economically disadvantaged, there were more broken do families, so i would ask you to take a look 4c if you can have bdf consistency, i think it makes sense. I dont think that april 6msarth me 1917 is th worstdo3w in the world, but i think consistency, one of the rules we need tz by up here÷u is if we can create things that are consistent, it just makes it easier for everybody. So please take ao38 look at that. Theq 1n last thing i would as yout2bn÷ could consider community sort of community of historians. Every state has a state Historic Preservation officer, and if y
To sit in on this hearingzar and i appreciate your leadership. Its been an honor ton e serve with you in congress. a youveni v had a distinguished o 5i9 i happenxwln7 j n8hn good luckdm0hahe. I really do r appreciate th2pczzi hahp hc wayt0huve treated our veterans and the way youve realltn worked withrsh7u sides]bt to come to common ground. Here. I have awocx couple questions for mr. uk] walters and then i want to don5srv n dx holland. Mr. v trwalters,5 xcig ny dd ÷kc new regulation that wo, d deal with next of kin. Frankly, the old policy g6ajx2 ÷ homeless4obc veterans and folks whose next of kin identified because they had servetugyw in a conflict much further bacc1 e s7l in our history, headstones. So i appreciate the updated version. T ÷gij onlyl a fewm÷tn questions that i havep about it because theres someoqfi folks g that arelcyrm1bc historians and other lu÷ archivists that are interested in helping language thateks wqb u they dont quite . Pv undgqfn t and i j] . Gd toukyk u