We are in midtown manhattan where branding and marketing is a big business. What did you learn about nike and microsoft, starbucks . Guest its great to be with you and to have this time. When i was writing a logo it came out at the beginning of 2000, soso it is almost exactly 20yearsold and when i was researching it for years before that, it was a period where a lot is changing in the corporate world and there was a full blown lifestyle brand that we all take now, but these were companies that for the first astime were declaring the busins model wasnt to sell products but did so ideas or the sense of belonging that they could then extend into kind of selfimposed branded cocoons and so everything as long as it was branded this logo. So nike was the first one to do this. They didnt ever own their factories in it and the main thing i learned when i was researching is that there was a relationship between this aggressive kind of marketing that was constantly sort of trolling thely Youth Cu
Speaker1 how is that done . How do they become people . One of the most important raise the Supreme Court made Corporation People if you will is simply to look beyond the corporation and throughout American History the Supreme Court has granted corporations expansive Constitutional Rights, often ignoring the corporate form saying we need to protect the rights of the people who come together to form the corporation and while that idea probably made a lot of sense in the early 1800s as corporations were spot small its hard to know if the same idea makes the same degree of sense in a world where you have general motors, hundreds of thousands of shareholders and many hold only invest in the company for a matter of moments as a play on the market or does it still makes sense to break through the corporate form and see those people the need or should we try to separate the rights of the corporation from the rights of the underlying people. Was this baked into the convent constitution in any
What that means in the law is bigger independently recognizable entities and they can have Property Rights and contracts. The idea is very foundational to the american law and what is unusual is they have in interpreted them as the constitution and use that idea for extending the fundamental rights to corporations as well. How is that done. In American History the Supreme Court has granted corporations the rights ignoring the form saying we need to protect the rights of the people that come together to form the corporation it made sense in the early 18 hundreds. Its a matter of moments and a play on the market does it make sense to break through and to see all those people to protect their rights in the same way or should we try to separate the rights of the corporation from the rights of the underlining people. They never considered whether they should have constitutional protections. It never came up in the rabbit fighting conventions because they were few and far between. Its among
The lot and they can have property rights, contracts and thats why you file suit against walmart the legal entity that is the corporation. Corporate personhood is foundational to american law. Whats unusual is that the court has interpreted corporations to the people for purposes of the constitution and use that idea as a basis for extending fundamental individual rights to corporations as well. Host how is that done . How do they become people in that sense . Guest one of the most important ways the Supreme Court made corporations people if you will is simply to look beyond the corporation and throughout American History the Supreme Court has granted corporations expansive Constitutional Rights. Often ignoring the corporate form and thing we need to protect the rights of the people who come together to form the corporation. While that idea made a lot of sense in the early 1800s as corporations were very small its hard to know whether that same idea makes the same degree of sense in a
I enthusiastically support his nomination and urge my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to do the same. With that, mr. President , i yield the floor. Center from rhode island. Thank you, mr. President. There are few moments in the life of the nation when the people are presented with a single choice that directly affects what equality before the law will mean for the next generation. The opportunity to grant a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court of the United States is one of those moments. The United States Supreme Court justice will break the deadlock that is constrained the course since the passing of judge scalia come and visit bodies unprecedented refusal to act on chief Justice Merrick garland nomination to fill the vacancy during the final year of president obamas second term. We must consider this nomination in its historical context. Chief justice garland was one of the most qualified nominees of the Supreme Court in generations here after meeting with him and moving