trump s rhetoric led to the storming of the capitol, even though we just had the january 6th that said it did. you said that in okay, you questioned the election itself. you voted against impeachment. you voted against creating an independent commission for the january 6th account. on voting laws, you voted you defend voting laws that said getting rid of ballot harvesting is a good thing, so you defended the florida voting laws. they have the best election laws in the country. florida laws are the best election laws in the country. we do it the best. all right, and you have defended and actually have cosponsored two pieces of legislation opposing critical race theory. what is critical race theory in your view? critical race theory comes from critical theory. and essentially what it does at the graduate level, it talks about the implications of racial policies in the past, their impact on society today. hold on, the issue with critical race theory if you distill it
and then it moves to podcasts, and then suddenly it is coming out of politicians, like marjorie taylor green, or lauren boebert s mouth. and people do this for money and political clout, and all sorts of reasons but it has real world effects. and we ve done this so many times, right? we talked about it in 2019, anti-immigrant rhetoric led to many shootings, mass shootings, people died in el paso at walmart, anti-semitic online hate speech leads to a mass shooting in a synagogue, we have seen this as well. and this keeps happening and we keep finding out after the fact that this has happened and the shooter s main motivation, we don t know right now but it feels very familiar. we read the sort of plan festos so many times, and the idea now that the people spreading this online rhetoric, that are demonizing, dehumanizing lbgtq folks, calling them gloomers and pedophiles, and the people who
knows what that might bring if the president that is willing to try to and still and encourage, to whip up a civil war amongst his own followers using lies and deceit, using snake oil, this is regardless of the human impact, what else is he going to do if he gets elected again? what else indeed. every day now we are learning that january six was where is that we originally thought. donald trump s rhetoric led to his white supremacist followers becoming domestic terrorists that ultimately became a huge threat to our country. a former member of that group was part of the insurrection. they are warning there could be more violence ahead of trump runs again in 2024. rumors say that he is definitely running. he says he has already made the decision, it is now just a matter of when he will announce
top diplomat repeating the false claim that it is trying to denazify ukraine shrugs off the fact that ukraine s president is jewish and makes an absurd assertion. he makes an argument which is what kind of nazification they have if he is a jew. i could be wrong but i think hitler also was a jew. they said the words were untrue and the intentions are wrong. the chairman of the holocaust memorial called the remark false and despicable. he is basically engaging in holocaust inversion, making the victims of the holocaust the perpetrators. and that is inexcusable. reporter: analysts say it is part of a dangerous pattern of twisted russian rhetoric led by putin since the war began, smearing ukraine s leaders. translator: this gang of drug addicts and neo-nazi that s has settled in kyiv and taken hostage the entire ukraine
and of course here in washington where you ve heard most of this rhetoric, anti-police rhetoric led to, clearly led to violence in this country, the people that are spouting this rhetoric are all protected. they have guards, they have their own special police force that protects them. they do not face the front end of the crime the way regular normal citizens do, and i have to say there are two things that change elections, that force massive change elections. one of them is economics, personal economics, and the other is personal safety. and when you see that sort of blythe dismissiveness, like jen psaki, that leads to massive changes in electoral politics. sandra: and she s welcome to come back and tell us where she stands on, we have an open invitation, fox does not have a seat in the room, we ll see if