priority for your company s hr department? a conflict management issue of, say, epic proportions? all of those examples are happening right now to members of congress and nothing is being done about it. certainly not by the one person whose literal job it is to manage his party s caucus. where one republican house member is quickly becoming the ultimate toxic employee. instead that republican who is a promoter of the qanon cult now sits on the house education committee despite having publicly claimed that school massacres are staged. and i can t believe that i m actually about to say this, but we have now learned that the same toxic congresswoman also believes that laser beams from outer space ignited california s deadliest ever wildfire. laser beams from outer space! but here s the thing, maybe, just maybe marjorie q. greene isn t the republican outlier that some imagine that she is. maybe she s more representative of the republican caucus than anyone in the party would like
robinson, apparently tired, punched fairly well and rocked jake right to his heels. come on, ray. a director and actor finds a story at the right time in the right place. and out comes this amazing combination of cinematic virility and absolute fear. it s like watching an animal. raging bull is a great title. the film fulfills the promise. the reality of the boxing and the great slow motion, all of the black and white gore, the violence of the flush bulbs going off. when he designed the movie, marty purely, he didn t pickup a clutch on the film. there s no clutch. hey, ray, you never went down, ray. you never got me down, ray. it s a boxing movie for people who don t like boxing. because it s really not about that. it s about this man who was based on a real person who is really at war with himself. come on. harder. harder. i didn t really understand boxing, but the character was interesting. he was just so contraire, as they say. he was
vaccine mandate. let s go out front. good evening, i m erin burnett. out front tonight the justice department charging 11 people with seditious conspiracy. it is a charge rarely used. the 11 people include stewart rose, the leader of the far right extremist group the oath keepers. this is a major move in the investigation and the indictment is damning, right? it s 48 pages here. i m going through here. rhoades indictment. it details prior planning, use of military tactics, stash of weapons and they stored weapons outside of washington. it s really shocking the level of planning here. so used to a certain chorus of people saying it got out of hand on the fly and there were bad actors out there. when you get to page 4, this really stood out to me. page 4, rhoades and certain co-conspirator planned to stop the lawful transfer of power which applied multiple force. and we re prepared to answer rhoades call to take up arms. some co conspirators amass beinged firearms distri
charged including their leader, stewart rhodes. the highest profile individual charged so far in connection with january 6th. so-called oath keepers are the ones we saw in tactical gear and combat formation that day. you can see them there. the indictment says that rhodes and the others engaged in a conspiracy to, quote, oppose the lawful transfer of presidential power by force, by preventing, hindering, or delaying by force execution of laws governing the transfer of power. now, according to the prosecutors, the so-called oath keepers stationed themselves around the d.c. area, some near the capitol, with a group waiting at a nearby virginia hotel with a cache of weapons. they also say the plotting did not end with the attacks and that rhodes and others met later to celebrate the day and, quote, discuss next steps. this was by any stretch a big deal, which is we ll discuss with our legal team in a moment, could get much bigger. attorney general garland may have telegraphed it
what do you stand for? robinson apparently tired and rocked jake lamotta. a director, an actor find a story at the right time in the right place. out comes this amazing combination of cinematic verility and absolute fear. it s like watching an animal. i think raging bull is a great title. the film fulfills the promise. the reality of the boxing and the great slow motion and all of the black and white gore and the flashbulbs. when he designed the movie, mardi didn t put a clutch on the film. there s no clutch. hey, never got down. he never got me down. raging bull is a boxing movie for people who don t like boxing. it s not about that. it s about this man, jake lamotta, based on a real person who is at war with himself. harder. harder. i didn t understand boxing. the character was interesting. he was just so contraire as they say. evers just so difficult. what are you trying to prove? what does it prove? bob de niro, he s not afraid of the negative cha