top leaders of the senate intelligence committee outlining plan outside of the capitol that stalled the investigations. we haare just getting this comg in laura. that s right, don, so a federal judge in hawaii has granted the state s request for a longer term halt of the president s revised travel ban. you will remember two weeks ago a district court judge in hawaii derek watson revised executive order but was only a temporary halt called temporary restraining order which typically expires after around 14 days. so the plaintiff asked it to be converted to longer term preliminary conjunction so it
why he is pleased with the president revised travel ban compared to imaginal one, a federal judge in virginia echoing that praise, and denying a request to block the president s revised orders, where will new judicial voice of support take the president s travel ban, joining me now, keisha, defense attorney and chris, a trial attorney, how does this change the course of newer travel ban? it really does not change the effect of it right now, because there still remains a nationwide freed on the ban but it does give a new. yoa judicial voice. i see this as a predictable place. new travel ban, it fixed a lot
afternoon. thank you very much, eric. uma: a federal judge from hawaii putting it snag and president trumps plan to roll out a revised travel ban. next, hawaii responding to that ruling. speaking of which of the presidents they can pick for the supreme court pick begins tomorrow. fox news contributor julie will be joining us next. stay with us let me talk to you about retirement. a 401(k) is the most sound way to go. let s talk asset allocation. -sure. you seem knowledgeable, professional. i m actually a deejay. -[ laughing ] no way! -that really is you? if they re not a cfp pro, you just don t know. cfp. work with the highest standard.
disclosing this type of information jeopardize ourselves national security and jeopardizes the men and women who work tirelessly around the clock to keep americans safe. let me get your reaction to these two federal judges who have now blocked the president s revised travel ban executive order. you have called it muslim ban 2.0. the white house says this is an issue of national security. not having this ban makes the u.s. look weak. is there any additional screening measure you would support? what s your reaction to the latest judicial setback for the president on his travel ban? there isn t any circumstance under which i would support muslim ban 1 nor 2. i commend the judges and the courts for pushing back. and i think what this says, it speaks to the vision of our founding fathers who were, in fact, complicated but set up three different branchs of government to act as check and balance. of course, the press and media acting as the fourth estate. these actions are
two big setbacks. revised travel ban already blocked. on round two through the courts and difficulty getting own party behind him on the obamacare replacement plan. is this unprecedented? it s a lot out of the box like this but unsurprising. very unconventional president who has made broad promises, particularly on the health care front without a great deal of attention to the details. having it filled in that way creates a situation where he wants big reform but doesn t have anything really specific to fight for. that puts him at mercy to some extent of speaker ryan in this case. interestingly, ryan seems to be stuck between the right and the left here. got a freedom caucus that doesn t believe this is repeal of obamacare, fundamental tenet