marriage for many purposes. so there are lots of federal rights and benefits and speedometers that don t come along with this marriage. that s a fight that we re going to continue to wage and that other people continue to wage as well in terms of the basic marriage, you get all the same responsibles that any other would get. i m going to ask your opinion here. when you see the political resistance to gay marriage, why do you think it exists? do you think people have a fundamental issue with gay people being married? do you think they have a fundamental issue with homosexuality, period? what s the reason to be against gay marriage? what s the reason to be against
before, they didn t want to cooperate because they were afraid of this very sort of leak ui want to read a section from a battle op-ed. reports of a commander at the farthest edge of the war zone are by nature, clipped, compressed, junky and incomplete. what he s saying instead of actually revealing what happened on the battlefield, these documents may distort it. let s hope it distorted it enough. paul: in terms of the incident. but picking up on something that matt said. i think that people also need to talk about the responsibles not of the times, but the news organization that is released this because you could make a credible case that there was a compelling public interest or leak some of this material if it s revealing that the bush administration or the obama
intelligence agencies and before, they didn t want to cooperate because they were afraid of this very sort of leak ui want to read a section from a battle op-ed. reports of a commander at the farthest edge of the war zone are by nature, clipped, compressed, junky and incomplete. what he s saying instead of actually revealing what happened on the battlefield, these documents may distort it. let s hope it distorted it enough. paul: in terms of the incident. but picking up on something that matt said. i think that people also need to talk about the responsibles not of the times, but the news organization that is released this because you could make a credible case that there was a compelling public interest or leak some of this material if
any impacts that are legitimate and created by this, we ll meet our responsibilities and we ve shown that from the very, very beginning. an example of that was the thing we did two days ago with the $stake to stop the process. you say legitimate claims are, and how would you measure what s legitimate claim is and would you go beyond the $75 million cap to the claims that would be legitimate. i don t think the $75 million cap will be the issue. of course, things where there s impact from this event, this spill, whether they be economic impact or whether it be environmental impact, we ll have to meet those responsibles and just an example of that right now, you know, people can call our hotline. they can file a claim and they ll actually get their money. we want to get it to them quickly because we know this is having an impact on people today. a $75 million cap was put in place in 1990 just after the
national security or the financial security of the country or the world. according to the woodward s book the president does not like to prepare himself for the responsibles of the office he holds. as one aide concluded, trump acted like doing too much advance preparation would diminish his skills and improvising. he believes in his gut, this idea that he can captain his own ship and he knows what s best. the problem is empathy is a part of the presidential job, something she hasn t done job. think of charlottesville, to try to bring us together, he s failed at that. now you have this big hurricane coming and instead of saying we want to make sure we learn from our mistakes, he s saying skom of it on twitter but he can t help but say this is about me and i did such a great job.