And ties into what the Ranking Member has talked about, where the decisions are made and what paul talked about in terms of, how is it that it relates to the ability to perform. Well, one thing i would say is that lsz fr also as leaders, if youve got someone to let go at the captain level, the leader needs to be held accountable, also, because any one of us if our team does something, were ultimately responsible as the leaders and i think that, coming from the top, is so critical of making this a priority. I had a specific question, also, about what senator king referenced regarding the 46 program and wouldnt it make sense for all major defense acquisition production programs to be designed so that the contractor absorbs the cost overruns for production . If i could, senator . Yes. I think its important to understand the risks. Sometimes the threat drives us to take risks because we need to. And when the risks arent clear, that cost sharing between us and the contractor has to be consi
Senator as chair of the joint board in the february open internet decision, the commission expressly extended the referral to the joint board. As you probably know under section 254 of the law, assessment for universal service is on the basis of interstate Telecommunication Services. And we are charged with making sure that that fund has specific, predictable, and sufficient support. The joint board is tasked with trying to figure out how to update that support mechanism, but the underlying terminology associated with Telecommunication Service is now the subject of litigation in the court of appeals. So the commission decided that it would defer decisionmaking on that until the Legal Environment is more stable. But pardon. Are you concerned that the title two order is not going to withstand litigation fully intact . Well, i have no crystal ball when it comes to the decisions of the dc circuit, i have confidence in our decision as it was made. We are resourceconstrained, it would not be
Are [ no audio ] [ crowd chatter ] keep moving, keep moving. Keep moving. Secretary madam secretary, how do you feel . How do you feel the hearing went . Still awake . If you want to pass through, you have to have a pass. If not go back to the area we had you before. Right, i know that. Charlie. All the republicans went in to a meeting. I can either get you cummings or congressman and 11 hours, minus breaks that the House Select Committee on benghazi has been meeting. And Hilary Clinton walking out the door we will bring you any lawmaker reactions after this. If lawmakers decide to come to what are known as our stakeout positions. Until then, we will take your phone calls, we want to hear what you think about what you heard about the day. Hilary clinton at the house Benghazi Committee. We are going get to it with frank being our caller, buffalo, new york, democrat. Caller hi, my maname is fra, i voted for george w. Bush, the first one, the senior. He got us out of iraq, before we took
No, it did not. I mean, were always were always assessing our posture and where we can put our assets. Not something we normally get into much detail on but we always want to make sure weve got our assets positioned properly. As we see where, you know, the focus of our strikes are based on the fluidity of our battlefield maybe we need to reposition our assets to make sure where were spending more time in the air weve got an asset closer to respond if needed. Hi, colonel. As a followup to this question, given the different tactical capabilities of the f16s and a10s is this deployment indicating tactical change in the mission as well or will they do exactly the same thing that f16 did . And the secondly, you mentioned about syrian iraq coalition. What is your understanding about the Syrian Forces . Patrick asked this question last weekend and he said he would look at it. What is your understanding about this new form and is this indicating the same thing or Different Group or can i get y
Some of the solutions in the option 3 we have sufficiently balanced the interests were not suggesting that officers should never be able to view the video and not suggesting we distrust them im mindful of some of the documents i did of these olden to me in one of the comments the officers made i troubled me i want to go back some of the reports do indicate drove are harm caused by distrust starting with the policy we distrust your Police Officers one of the pieces from the experts there is a detrimental that blocking the information bound to send offers a message of distrust i want to say tonight this decision around option 3 not to send a motioning message of distrust but identify this is an investigations investigations are fluid and need to have safeguards in place colleagues, any followup before i entertain a commission. Commissioner dejesus. The audit is a critical part in investigation 3 it is new and should have a timeframe for that audit 6 months or 8 months or a year a timefra