Today, i wanted to kickoff and welcome you to the first every family well forum clapping. compromising is carmen chu currently which this of the family forum we put this event dough went to a lot of Community Meetings and were he and she about families worries and troubles aaron planning for the future and ahsha safai for buying a home and college and retirement and for many of the seniors how to passing on their prompts to their kids. The family Forum Benefits throughout San Francisco im supervisor norman yee representing district 7 people are homeowners fritter buyers and they dont thinks the planning. What youll notice if you walk around todays activities multiple languages transactions available for people in the seminars and 101 counseling and the today, we not only have vendors that have come here the seminars where people are lining about important topics was of most unique pieces we have oneonone free counseling for people so important that people understand about taxes and how
My name is maurice miller, commissioners. Thank you for hearing us. I have three general comments. I shall say, first of all, the reason the piewood is on the the reason the plywood is on the roof right now is for safety reasons because there was no glass installed because we got the permit to put in a 6foot glass and then we were told not to install the 6foot glass. So there was never any intention not to install glass and reinstall it. We were told we could install 6foot glass and purchased its and it sits in my garage. This is my primary outdoor space for the building. I have problems with stairs, and we would like the roof to be more usable. That said, the 42inch screen would also have been acceptable had we been told that we couldnt do a 6foot screen. In response to the comments about 16 poles, in fact, there will be less obstruction because the glass windscreen does not require a top rail. The 42inch windscreen does require a top rail and the amount of steel on the roof will be m
Second. Why dont we call for Public Comment. Are there any members of the public that would like to address the commission on item 19 . Seeing none, we will close Public Comment. Commissioner driscoll . Just a comment that yes, the committee did spend time on this, but the majority of work was done by the manager. Yes. Also, the attorney of the City Attorneys staff helped, and im sure mr. Huish was looking over their shoulders at all times. Yes, and they also had outside counsel. And can i say, a majority of the recommended changes were over seen by city of moi, who is a member of my team. Okay. Any discussion . There was a motion, there was a second, can we take this item without objection . Great. Item number 19 passes. Can we just move onto 20 or do you want to move . We need item 15, which is the review of van berkom issue. Do you want to put 20 and 21 together or do you want to push them to another meeting. Whatever your pleasure, mr. President. I feel like number 20 is the Invest
Basin nations in the United States. For those who dont know where that is, the great states of nevada, utah, parts of arizona and oregon. And before that i worked at the trust public land. And im happy to lead with london breed, malia cohen, our former supervisor who first championed this issue, in favor of the full divestment from fossil fuels. I want to start by thanking the Broad Coalition of environmental advocates, Public Health advocates, clean fuel transportation activists, Democratic Party officials, grassroots advocates and retirement Board Members and as of last night, the commission on the environment who have turned out today to demand that San Francisco Employee Retirement system divest now from fossil fuels and were getting to labor, were saving the best for last. And i mean that sincerely and it is in my notes. I want to start by saying that sciu 101 has been the wind at our backs. I cannot thank you enough. To the folks from dapo, i cannot thank you enough. Well hear fr
Im trying to add meat to the previous motion and now it needs more time. I think what is important here this is been a Monumental Task for staff. And there are things i asked staff back in july, to do that have been pushed back several months affect the portfolio, not just a small portion. If were going to focus on a small portion were missing the big picture. Governor brown said in the next downturn, pensions will be cut. We have people on one side of the room who hate us and want to cut us to nothing, like in san jose and we have people on the other side of the room that are supposed to support us and want to cut us down to nothing. What were trying to do is just things take a little bit of time. No one here is against what you are saying. Were just asking to give staff wiggle room so it can be thoughtful. Thats all. Excuse me. Governor brown is not going to be the governor for very much longer. For those that are going to vote in the governors race start thinking how you will evalua