Traditionally a blue democratic state. Can a republican who has won in the past defeat the sitting governor . The last time we had we have had illinois isernors this governor seen as vulnerable. Thats why there is a lot of National Attention on this race. Governor lieutenant. Rob laboy o going whi he is a populist. He is an organizer. Is bill hiresgist deblasios campaign manager. He is an underdog financially. Steve has tremendous problems. Higher than the National Average unemployment rate. Field is openg right now. Host there are a couple there are a couple of number primary race is shaping up including the illinois tenth Congressional District. Can you explain whats happening there . Guest that is the district likely to michigan district hugs the lake shore and goes north to chicago. Brad schneider is going into a rematch with republican bob dole after disturbing one term neither of them have a primary today. They have been raising a lot of money because it is an extend media market
Analysis what is going on here as well. Thank you. So good way, what you said, professor ku. I want to understand you, professor donohue, what you said, i may not being took the best notes. Walk me through the argument. A minute ago you said you were making distinction between collection of for little intelligence purposes and collection focused for the purpose of prosecution. So are you, is it your view that 702 collection is for the purpose of prosecution . It is one of the two stated purposes for which the information can be retained once it is collected. So it that is different. What im asking about, you said for the collected for the purpose of prosecution i thought . What is, i guess what im trying to get at, this distinction between foreign intelligence purpose and criminal purpose relevant at the collection stage only or all stages or what, help me understand what youre so in the Previous Panel brad addressed this point. He mentioned in the context of its a moment which the inf
Next, a discussion about National Political party nominations, scandal, and comebacks, as well as rules changes for the 2016 election. This is part of the state of the parties conference. It runs just under two hours. We have four papers to be presented. We hope you will have great interest in what they present. More than anything else, we hope you will have Great Questions because this group of individuals have not only studied what has been, but are giving us perspective of what is to come. I think youll find their perspectives very interesting. About party a paper power and the causal effects of endorsements. Seth is at the university of denver and eric is at the public posse institute of california. I will shut up and let them talk. Whats were here presenting this on behalf of our other co authors. We are trying to come up with a measurement of the impact of a Party Endorsement in a primary, which is traditionally a tricky thing to measure. Study toing a fun case do this. This is t
Cannot do it on your own. You need people who are going to join into this endeavor with you and help you achieve it. I was lucky enough to have a bunch of great people doing that. And just trying to figure out you know, some people you know, just trying to figure out what makes an institution work, the personal dynamics within an institution, and using that knowledge to figure out how you can move and change and shift the place. It is a little bit different, but one of the things that you did that i find very striking is the concern that the senate had about the fact that you had no knowledge of hunting and guns. [laughter] and the way that you responded to that i think is reflective do you want me to tell the story . It is a great story. [laughter] talking to people before hand about what they wanted to hear, a number of them wanted to hear the hunting story. Ok, they have not heard the hunting story . A couple of them have. One thing you have to understand when you go through senate
Want my colleagues to think about, or i think that for whatever reason they might not have focused on, i will try to use argument as my opportunity to do that. So you bring out a certain angle on the case that you think is relevant. Sometimes. I mean, not every time. Sometimes im asking questions because i really want to know the answers to them. Sometimes i am asking questions to try to convey certain points to my colleagues. And i think all of us do that to some degree. Would it be better and i realize it is not the tradition, but would it be better if people talk before the oral argument . Or is this a better structure . I could see why it might be. I think it can work either way. Just to flip to another topic, one of the things that is very striking about your career, you know, youve talked about being open to different opportunities and that it makes sense to be open rather than just say, this is what im going to do at 35 and this is what im going to do at 50. You have had a serie