dominant force at fox that is an appendage of the trump white house. one, he was trying to for democrats and people liberals he s appealing to, go on fox and call out some of their hosts. but it the other thing he did is he made the case for why democrats should go on fox and a very interesting debate happening about that. there s this view that don t help efox in any way. that elizabeth warren has taken and buttigieg is saying if you re president, you re going to have to deal with republicans in congress. so going on fox shouldn t be that much of a stretch. he s taken a different approach. that s an interesting comparison. but go on o, alice. i m not saying it s like iran and north korea. i m just saying you have to deal
when it actually says another. could i address one of the things that angela pointed out about republicans twusing and turning to explain this. i have said many times on this show and all over cnn that a lot of the activity taken on the part of the trump campaign in relation to this incident very ill advised, inappropriate, very ignorant and idiotic. but as to what the mueller report found, it did not authorize level of something that would lead to imepeachment. that sn take away from this is most republicans, pretty much everyone except for amash agrees with that and that s what american people republicans want most. that is exhibit a didn t tries conspiracy in court nation. on the part of obstruction. that s still very left up to. if democrats want to impeach, they can impeach on that. we have to be clear about the separation of powers which i think is the fundamental
these are not people who dhiem came to the defense of the obama administration when they were fighting with congress over benghazi or fast and the furious. these are not people who defended bill clinton when cong republicans were trying to impeach bill clinton. thaw only discover their respect for the limitless power oz of the presidency when the president happens to be a republican. they re hall of fame hypocrites. interesting. jennifer rogers, you want to weigh in on that or do you want to move on? up to you. let s talk about the house intel committee releasing the transcripts of cohen s testimony. he told congress it was it trump s attorney ewho suggested saying the drump tower moscow project ended in january of 2016. and sekulow knew it was false. if cohen is right is sekulow in legal hot water. is he in trouble?
of the activity taken on the part of the trump campaign in relation to this incident very ill advised, inappropriate, igingnerrant and idiotic. but as to what the mueller report found, it did not authorize level of something that would lead to imepeachment. that sn take away from this is most republicans, pretty much everyone except for amash agrees with that and that s what american people republicans want most. that is exhibit a didn t tries conspiracy in court nation. that s still very left up to. if democrats want to impeach, they can impeach on that. we have to be clear about the separation of powers which i think is the fundamental foundational principal all of the debates that we have. people are forgetting that there s a distinction. mueller s obligation wasn t
thaw only discover their respect for the limitless power oz of the presidency when the president hap ngz to boo ea republican. they re hall of fame hypocrites. interesting. jennifer rogers, you want to weigh in on that or do you want to move on? up to you. let s talk about the house intel committee releasing the transcripts of cohen s testimony. he told congress it was it trump s attorney ewho suggested saying the drump tower moscow projecteneded in january off 2016 and that sec low knew that was faults. is he in trouble? i mean potentially. it s an explosive allegation. the problem is cohen had credibility issues. we re not talking about sekulow being charged with the crime. the problem is whether there s a crime or fraud that gives you