Department: Awards and Grants
Reporting to: Awards and Grants Coordinator
Direct reports: N/A
ABOUT Relief International.
Relief International (RI) is a leading nonprofit organization working in 16 countries to relieve poverty, ensure well-being and advance dignity. We specialize in fragile settings, responding to natural disasters, humanitarian crises and chronic poverty.
Relief International combines humanitarian and development approaches to provide immediate services while laying the groundwork for long-term impact. Our signature approach which we call the RI Way emphasizes local participation, an integration of services, strategic partnerships, and a focus on civic skills. In this way, we empower communities to find, design and implement the solutions that work best for them.
Reports: Protection Technical Manager, Whole of Syria (WOS)
About RI: Relief International is a leading nonprofit organization working in roughly 20 countries to relieve poverty, ensure well-being and advance dignity. We specialize in fragile settings, responding to natural disasters, humanitarian crises and chronic poverty. Relief International combines humanitarian and development approaches to provide immediate services while laying the groundwork for long-term impact. Our signature approach which we call the RI Way emphasizes local participation, an integration of services, strategic partnerships and a focus on civic skills. In this way, we empower communities to find, design and implement the solutions that work best for them.
Program/Project Management Job in Turkey about Protection and Human Rights, requiring 0-2 years of experience, from Syria Relief; closing on 01 Mar 2021
when let s move to the whistle-blower question once more. and i m shifting topics completely. this came up several times today. i understand your point that whistle-blower is entitled to anonymity. but explain to me how it happens that the person accused when a whistle-blower makes an accusation, can have the right that most americans think they should have two confront those testifying against them? how is that accomplished? so i will speak to what we do. we get anonymous allegations frequently. we get people coming forward who are reporting misconduct to onee to be anonymous, stay anonymous and we get them both ways. keep me anonymous and anonymous complaints. we move forward on both if we think they are sufficient to move forward on amp predicated and have support. but we then have to prove the allegations and get cooperation for it because you are right.
that the person accused when a whistle-blower makes an accusation can have the right that mostcu americans think the should have to confront those testifying against them? how how is thatng accomplish? so i ll speak to what we do. we get anonymous allegations frequently. we get people coming forward who are reporting misconduct who want to be anonymous. want to stay anonymous. so we get them both ways. we get people walking in saying keep me anonymous. and anonymous complaints.g in we move forward on both if we think they aree sufficient to move forwardre on. and predicated and have support. but we then have to prove the allegations and get corroboration for its because you re right. the individual, if there is a finding ofhe misconduct, has a right to ultimately challenge the evidence found. but it doesn t necessarily mean that they get all the way back to where the nugget started.