years, as set out in paragraph three of schedule 21. i must therefore consider of schedule 21. i must therefore consider the aggravating and mitigating factors, set out in paragraphs nine and ten, together with any paragraphs nine and ten, together with any other relevant circumstances. they can be no doubt that this circumstances. they can be no doubt that this shooting involves a significant degree of planning and premeditation. i bear in mind that many. premeditation. i bear in mind that many. if premeditation. i bear in mind that many if not premeditation. i bear in mind that many, if not most murders, involving firearms, many, if not most murders, involving firearms, involve some premeditation, and that is already accounted premeditation, and that is already accounted for in the starting point. the evidence in this case demonstrates planning it going well beyond demonstrates planning it going well beyond that. the defendant had sourced beyond that. the defendant h
and her ensure that, but injuries she did, and her courage is to be applauded. in and her courage is to be applauded. in the and her courage is to be applauded. in the sentencing of olivia pratt korbel, i must follow the statutory pratt korbel, i must follow the statutory provisions in 21, of the sentencing statutory provisions in 21, of the sentencing act 2020. paragraph two, two ba sentencing act 2020. paragraph two, two ba of sentencing act 2020. paragraph two, two ba of schedule 21 provides that the starting point for the murder of a child the starting point for the murder of a child involving a substantial degree a child involving a substantial degree of planning or premeditation is a whole degree of planning or premeditation is a whole life order. i have considered whether that applies to this case considered whether that applies to this case i considered whether that applies to this case. i have concluded that it does this case. i have concluded that it doe
killed very conscious that the shot that killed 0livia was one of those aimed atjoseph killed 0livia was one of those aimed atjoseph nee, while attempting to kill him. atjoseph nee, while attempting to kill him, and was the same shot that wounded kill him, and was the same shot that wounded cheryl korbel. however, i must wounded cheryl korbel. however, i must reflect the fact that the harm caused must reflect the fact that the harm caused was not limited to killing olivia. caused was not limited to killing 0livia, but also concluded in serious 0livia, but also concluded in serious injury to other people, to other serious injury to other people, to other people. had i been sentencing the defendant for the attempted murder ofjoseph nee attempted murder of joseph nee alone. attempted murder of joseph nee alone. i attempted murder ofjoseph nee alone, i would attempted murder ofjoseph nee alone, iwould have imposed attempted murder ofjoseph nee alone, i would have i
The defeated Republican presidential candidate sued Mr. Boroson and the magazine he worked for, saying it had libeled him for suggesting that he was mentally unfit for the presidency.