detestable lie. relatedly, there is the assertion that i did not answer senator franken s question honestly at my confirmation hearing. colleagues, that is false. i can t say colleagues now. i m no longer a part of this body, but a former colleague. that is false. this is what happened. senator franken asked me a rambling question after some six hours of testimony that included dramatic new allegations that the united states intelligence community, the u.s. intelligence committee had advised president-elect trunk gimmick trump, that there is a continuing exchange of information during the campaign between trump s surrogates and intermediaries for the russian government. i was taken aback by that explosive allegation, which he
card breach. brian sullivan is here with what s moving your money. brian, what are they looking for? i guess you d say, chris, target to the bullseye of two democratic senators asking for information about the data breach, names, home addresses, whatever it is. they are basically asking target to come forward and explain exactly what happened. a lot of people have expressed concern about that. of course, privacy is a big issue. this could be one of the biggest data breaches in the history of the world, so the senators going after it. separately but relatedly, jpmorgan chase saying it will replace 2 million credit cards and debit cards. the ceo saying this is a big issue and it s not going away. chris, listen, we talk about computer privacy all the time, i think that at some point we re going to get to a critical mass and figure out other solutions, whether it s biometric fingerprints or chip in a credit card like they do in europe, but, obviously, two democratic senators not happy wi
will be six hours of arguments over three days. caller: thank you very much for the preview. i hope the weather stap shapes up. it s been bad as they have been waiting. we introduced you to the man preparing to argue what could be the biggest supreme court case of a generation issue the fight against president obama s health care law. we bring you paul clement. why he wanted to tackle this case and his strategy for winning big. winning big. i think we will win this case by emphasizing two related principles. one is that this is a completely unprecedented exercise of congressional power. and relatedly the government and they have been asked many, any times just doesn t have limiting principle for their argument. congress has been passing laws for 220 years. there have been lots of crises and opportunities where it would be convenient to force people to buy something and congress never resorted to that power. you could ask yourself is that
oppression they bear under barack obama s collective experiment. they are still sitting pretty in their own version of inequality. we know president obama is a red blooded warrior for the middle class and no longer a detached professor of math. we know when republican front-runners get past the word israel their knowledge of foreign policy drops off a cliff. relatedly, we now know conservative intelligence is officially panicked about its field. we now know 30% of americans are obese. approximately 10 0% increase from 25 years ago. the number one factor of why that is, a new study finds it s because people are smoking less. now we know republican congressman mccotter is no longer running for president. but more importantly, we know he is bummed. quote, bummed, that r.e.m. is splitting up and given his guitar hero aspirations we will miss you.