This legislation, including an article in front page article in the San Francisco chronicle. This piece of legislation has been available to anyone who is interested in the issue. We have spoken, as i said earlier, to the San Francisco chamber of commerce and mr. Lazarus who spoke on behalf of the chamber of commerce indicated that he supports the aim of the legislation and that he feels better about it with the incorporation of the amendment that i just moved. We also set up a meeting with a number of contractors who during the hearing indicated some concern or desire to meet. We set up the meeting, but that meeting they did not attend the meeting, but we continue to extend our offer to meet with them whenever theyre willing and able. The Small Business commission heard this legislation and supports the aim of the legislation, but it decided that it did not want to take a position on the legislation without actually knowing what the recommendations from the equal pay Advisory Board wi
Since ive start to talking about the lack of clarity not specific targeted issues for anyone or the department or anyone in the Department Almost seven years ago i didnt know the drawings were submitted. Ive said it over and over again when are we going to get more cliefrt because drawings submittals that are unclear and circle and often result in having to send cases basing back because we do understand them made me think we need to intensity some clear applications to submit those in a consistent way. As the 7 year sitting here do we have for the first time from the secretary see that that we indeed have a say open appendix a. This was not given to us before so thank you for doing that. I ask the department and the director knows how can we be more clear. Were here to be basically working with you to deliver something that you spend a lot of time deliberating with with a large staff hours and hours but we get information that we cant properly support you it then gets sent back. I wen
Instructions sometimes you can print it in word but okay same thing this time. And you know, i did write the Commission Secretary who sent me a copy that was nice i was able to read it no one can read this one. Substantive comments i made a few last time you dont understand how difficult it is for people out there for not having Great Communications anyway to communicate this. If commissioner moore had though the mention we could send things to the secretary god that was great but most people dont know this if they dont send it to the Commission Secretary it wont go into the record. But, of course, as you know if they dont get them 8 days in advance they wont get it published so, now were hearing in the Commission Secretary is not on hear like kevin annoy or one of the planners it wont go into the record. This is about notification 2 weeks and sue hester thaut thought larkin was a difficult hearing and should have been notices. We got noticed on saturday we result was no lawyer here an
Properly support you it then gets sent back. I went through simply i or like a good student through the 9 places in the departments reducing instructions to the applicant and most succinctly under the plans guidelines and what i did because we have the add function in our word document i made red boxes to consistentlyly insert that the plans submittal guidelines should be the common reference for all 59 places. You have liquor one governing document probably the first thing people go to and i want to put in some consistency. One is to use digital photocopy. So that was i think the department accepted that and the next one had something to be with 3d documents and it didnt submit an undue hardship to anyone and simulates the 3d imagine because the tools are inexpensive. Theyre available to anyone for people who have good looking. Theres some other minor subtle things but to my question i dont see the recommendations picked up in the discussion and i want to hear each commissioners comme
A good student through the 9 places in the departments reducing instructions to the applicant and most succinctly under the plans guidelines and what i did because we have the add function in our word document i made red boxes to consistentlyly insert that the plans submittal guidelines should be the common reference for all 59 places. You have liquor one governing document probably the first thing people go to and i want to put in some consistency. One is to use digital photocopy. So that was i think the department accepted that and the next one had something to be with 3d documents and it didnt submit an undue hardship to anyone and simulates the 3d imagine because the tools are inexpensive. Theyre available to anyone for people who have good looking. Theres some other minor subtle things but to my question i dont see the recommendations picked up in the discussion and i want to hear each commissioners comments to my comments relative to the matter. I suffer like i do twho who the fa