those hearings will get tiresome in a hurry. if it looks like a courtroom, laura can certainly expound on this, that s just not good tv. that stuff can be really, really tedious. let s flip it, though. laura, mr. mueller didn t say anything you didn t know today, and yet because he said it and people heard it and watched it, it resonated. the power of television. when you have the ideas of privacy and recency, the first thing you heard, the last thing you heard. you were actually able to look at it like a jury says, oh, do i believe this person. was it poignant enough? was there gravitas. here s why i disagree with mike on impeachment being so politically untenable. what congress has been saying the whole time is that no one is above the law. if they treat it as an exercise in futility and say, you know what, as opposed to running out the clock, this is not a sports game where the american people are watching and run out the clock until you have a choice of a rock and a hard place
is that asking too much? well i m sure he has privately. you know, i mean, honestly. george w. bush does not strike me like the kind of guy who says don t ever say anything terrible about me. in 2006 they d ask him, all these candidates are running away from you. he said, i m fine with that. my guess is he probably has said that privately and probably will say so publicly. i think though alex amy is right. i think there s a recency effect here. most people have an active memory of the george w. bush years. to the extent and have lived through them for the extent people have a memory of the clinton years, you know i think we re now at a 20 year removed, some of the things that people didn t like faded a little bit. the rose colored glasses effect is taking shape. i think that s a major reason why the jeb problem is harder at some level for him than the hillary problem.
objector was shouting and tackled by three or four bailiffs and had to be carried out. there s several played there, mill len ya that support the traditional marriage definition and on other hand said it could bear the same relationship to lor is the 1967 case to brown versus board of education in 1954. he clearly positioned himself because he was a justice who wrote who might author. second, and quickly, he said the social science data may be out and one of the problems with the recency of the phenomenon of same-sex marriage is that we don t have the social science. very definitely said and we had trials on this michigan trial, adoption trials and perry trial were all instances in which the
it seems that he was definitely radicalized. he had told his wife his new wife that he wanted to go off to palestine to do jihad. obviously the authorities have confiscated or retrieved various sort of radical islamic imagery on his mobile devices and so on. everyone wants the perfect, you know explainer for why people go off to join isis. it s different reasons for different people. this guy could have had a psychological breakdown in his life and just decided, you know committing holy war is the way do go. you know i ve seen cases of people who are just lured to the ultraviolent totalitarian spectacle of isis thinking they should cast their lot with this movement which is now changing history. it s recency to read too much into one isolated case like this. you can see, michael, because we re so desperately trying to understand this foe, we want to
going to disagree with that. i d like him to get to the fight. he hasn t gotten there yet. but if he didn t make those assumptions, we wouldn t be here at all. paul henderson is here, patrick murphy is here, jonathan capehart is going to help me out here. i m going to pull a robbery from my friend lisa bloom and that is this, lisa said before she felt there was no theory of the case. and that s how i feel. there s no road map. there s no rhythm here. he s going on all the facts, he s telling a story but, again, you don t have that cinching everything together. that pattern, that rhythm. something to remember. patrick, throughout this whole thing, people have been saying the prosecution is not doing a good job. do you agree with that? well, i think overall, it s an okay close. but you re right in there has to be recency. the theme of his case is a