felony murder, a murder committed in the course of a felony, in this case, rape. the question for prosecutors without semen, how could they prove that a rape even occurred? if you have a rape case, wouldn t you have a semen sample that you could use to tie the rapist to the rape? if the rapist doesn t ejaculate, you have no semen sample. in this case, our supposition was that mr. ferris was choking cheryl miller to get her to participate in this act, and he killed her. and in that instance, he may very well have lost the desire to complete the act. you can t tell us what he was thinking, can you? no, i cannot tell you. the defense had one last chance to respond. blasting the prosecution experts. first, the medical examiner who disputed findings by the original pathologist, now dead, that the killer was sterile. it s 100% pure speculation. no, it is not. that is my opinion.
in order to do that, they had to convict him of what is called felony murder, a murder committed in the course of a felony, in this case, rape. the question for prosecutors without semen, how could they prove that a rape even occurred? if you have a rape case, wouldn t you have a semen sample that you could use to tie the rapist to the rape? if the rapist doesn t ejaculate, you have no semen sample. in this case, our supposition was that mr. ferris was choking cheryl miller to get her to participate in this act, and he killed her. and in that instance, he may very well have lost the desire to complete the act. you can t tell us what he was thinking, can you? no, i cannot tell you. the defense had one last chance to respond. blasting the prosecution experts. first, the medical examiner who disputed findings by the original pathologist, now dead, that the killer was sterile. it s 100% pure speculation. no, it is not. that is my opinion.
without parole. in order to do that, they had to convict him of what is called felony murder, a murder committed in the course of a felony, in this case, rape. the question for prosecutors without semen, how could they prove that a rape even occurred? if you have a rape case, wouldn t you have a semen sample that you could use to tie the rapist to the rape? if the rapist doesn t ejaculate, you have no semen sample. in this case, our supposition was that mr. ferris was choking cheryl miller to get her to participate in this act, and he killed her. and in that instance, he may very well have lost the desire to complete the act. you can t tell us what he was thinking, can you? no, i cannot tell you. the defense had one last chance to respond. blasting the prosecution experts. first, the medical examiner who disputed findings by the
committed in the course of a felony, in this case, rape. the question for prosecutors without semen, how could they prove that a rape even occurred? if you have a rape case, wouldn t you have a semen sample that you could use to tie the rapist to the rape? if the rapist doesn t ejaculate, you have no semen sample. in this case, our supposition was that mr. ferris was choking cheryl miller to get her to participate in this act, and he killed her. and in that instance, he may very well have lost the desire to complete the act. you can t tell us what he was thinking, can you? no, i cannot tell you. the defense had one last chance to respond. blasting the prosecution experts. first, the medical examiner who disputed findings by the original pathologist, now dead, that the killer was sterile. it s 100% pure speculation. no, it is not. that is my opinion. if you want to conclude it is speculation, sobeit.