a preference for a supreme court justices being nominated by a republican, or by a democrat. and if you are prepared to live with supreme court justices from either party, then you are a very unusual voter. so this is the product of all of those votes, all of those people who went out and voted for joe biden, that is how this has happened tomorrow. a little piece of good news, i m looking forward to your show tonight, lawrence. thank, you ali, thank you. tonight, we have a new reason i knew apparent reason why the january 6th committee rushed into that special session yesterday, to hear the public testimony of cassidy hutchinson. they want the white house counsel. they want him. and that s why they had to have that hearing yesterday. because cassidy hutchinson s testimony fully justified the subpoena to trump white house counsel pat cipollone that the committee issued today. the last time a president was destroyed by a congressional investigation, the white house coun
testimony fully justified the subpoena to trump white house counsel pat cipollone that the committee issued today. the last time a president was destroyed by a congressional investigation, the white house counsel was a key witness. richard nixon s white house counsel, john dean, helped bring down the nixon presidency, with his testimony in the watergate hearings. and now it looks like pat cipollone could be the witness who locks in donald trump s guilt for the january 6th committee. when presidents break the law, the white house counsel knows. the white house counsel s job is to prevent presidents from breaking the law, among other things. that is to say, prevent them from breaking the law intentionally or, as can happen, unintentionally. when someone in the white house has a bright idea, like banning all muslims from entering the country, it is the white house counsel s job to say, we can t do that, that s unconstitutional. the white house counsel is not the president s pers
distracted, merrick, by some people s claims that we don t really know his state of mind, whatever his state of mind was. keep in mind that even if you genuinely believe that the [inaudible] had stolen $5,780 from you. i use that number because it s familiar from the raffensperger dialogue. even if you still believe [inaudible] break into fort knox or lead an armed mob of the stairs of fort knox, to grab that money, that s what we seem to have seen. so, merrick, i hope you look up the u.s. code, the section on conspiracy, to defraud the u.s., the section on witness tampering, the section on corrupt attempts to impede an official proceeding, inciting or assisting an insurrection. but merrick, you are a great student, you don t need me to remind you of all that. what you need to focus on is how dangerous it would be to let this be held on
fomented it. so, i hope you won t be distracted, merrick, by some people s claims that we don t really know his state of mind, whatever his state of mind was. keep in mind that even if you genuinely believe that the [ irs has stolen $11,780 from you. i use that number because it s familiar from the raffensperger dialogue. even if you really believe they stole it, you can t break into fort knox or lead an armed mob up the stairs of fortune ox to grab the money. that s what we seem to have seen. so, merrick, i hope you look up the u.s. code, the section on conspiracy, to defraud the u.s., the section on witness tampering, the section on corrupt attempts to impede an official proceeding, inciting or assisting an insurrection. but merrick, you are a great student, you don t need me to remind you of all that. what you need to focus on is how dangerous it would be to