so more mammograms are going to need to be read. if artificial intelligence could work safely, work effectively and take away some tv that wor workload for radiologists, that could be a big step forward. thanks so much. all right. up next, this is something we ve been discussing, debating. perhaps arguing about this morning. i think something it s something that a lot of americans have debated. is america s tipping culture out of control? how much tip is appropriate? when do you actually tip? when is it okay not to tip? if you ask many people in the service industry, they will tell you there is a problem. we are going to discuss tipping etiquette and, i don t know, maybe get perspectives after the break. retired right? am i? ya! save up to $500 on the new sleep number® smart bed. plus, free home delivery when you add an adjdjustable base. shop now only at sleep numbmber®. my most important kitchen tool?
of reading mammograms was done with two radiologists. what they found is that in the group supported by a.i., for every 1,000 women screened, six cases of breast cancer were detected compared with five for the standard way of doing this. they found also that the artificial intelligence supported screening did not find more false/positives or cases where it detected cancer that wasn t there. that s good news as well. another really important thing here is that they found that the artificial intelligence supported screening could reduce the workload for radiologists by 44%. now, that s based on the fact in europe it s standard for two raid olgists to look at a mammogram, whereas, in the united states, that s not the standard. there might not be such a strong reduction in the u.s., but still there is a hope this could help with a shortage of radiologists which is expected to get worse as the population worse.
they don t really address tumors some some way and they can do anything. in a human that will take a decade or longer before a human actually gets this drug and they test. trace: so ai can now detect breast cancer along with some of the best radiologists? is that a fair assessment. i really believed it they trained ai to determine rent nal images. ai based on medical will get better than a human and at one point we won t even need real radiologists to look at these images. trace: covid you re not worried about a spike. i m not worried we re seeing some hospitalizations but not the surge of desks. some people are saying we re going to see the surgeoning of desk. we re not. the people at risk know they re at risk at this point and if they want to protect themselves they know what they need to do and if not it s on them.
GettyWell before ChatGPT reared its head and made AI a household topic around the world, the medical world was already keen on using AI-powered tools. For years, scientists have tested out whether bots could be used to help diagnose diseases in people, especially when it comes to the attention to detail required in assessing medical imagery. The results have been startling—even in some creepy ways.So it seems AI will play a role in medicine moving forward, perhaps sooner rather than later. A new