what is our political culture to do with that? it s got to both acknowledge that this is a problem and then use all of our resources to deploy against this. i mean, this is astonishing. this gives new meaning to the white house. it s exclusionary. it s division. it s a divisive rhetoric. the president of the united states of america, he who speaks on behalf of e pluribus unum, out of many one, our partisan politics or geography or religion or race, here is a guy reinforcing the very rudiments of racist ideology. we have a racist in chief. and i don t say that lightly because you can disagree with somebody. you can disagree with the out come of their intended remarks, but this is deeply entrenched in an america that sees black and white so bipolar opposition, and bipolar opposition into others,
white supremist terrorism. 70% of the victims of terrorism in the country have been victims of radical right wing terrorism. that s a threat hiding in plain sight which we were in ngnoring. the president knows that his words are being used by white nationalists whether it is fair or not. you would think he would want, you know, give a speech and lay it all out, naming names of who does not speak for him and why he find things reprehensible. or at least to make it clear people using his name of racist ideology. he s been given opportunities to do this. i remember when the journalist