post s broadcast licenses that they rely on for their revenue, which trump may be doing soon when he s granted the power of the executive office of the presidency. there s two things to follow up on. one of them was nixon was what s striking to me is not just this need to sort of always get back at people he feels have slighted him in the case of donald trump but also the publicness of it. nixon would not have taken to the podium and said, i don t like this person, this person and dan rather. he was self-controlled enough to channel that. this is different in so far as it s all just out there in the public. but this is the prejanuary 20th trump, chris. think about it. you know, william benny, the whistleblower at the nsa has called basically the spying apparatus that a president has at his disposal created by bush but continued by obama turnkey totalitarianism. once trump can find out anything his enemies are up to and find out where their vulnerabilities are, maybe find embarra
when he s granted the power of the executive office of the presidency. there s two things i want to follow up on. one is nixon was what s striking to me isn t just this need to kind of always get back at people he feels slighted him, in the case of donald trump, but also the publicness of it. nixon would not have taken to the podium and said i don t like this person, this person and dan rather. he was self-controlled enough to channel that. this is different in so far as it s all just out there in the public. but this is the pre-january 20 trump, chris. think about it. william benny, the whistle-blower of the nsa, has called basically the spying apparatus that a president has at his disposal created by bush but continued by obama turnkey totalitarianism so basically once trump can find out anything his enemies are up to and find out where their vulnerabilities
take away the washington post s broadcast licenses that they rely on for their revenue, which trump may be doing soon when he s granted the power of the executive office of the presidency. there s two things to follow up on. one of them was nixon was what s striking to me is not just this need to sort of always get back at people he feels have slighted him in the case of donald trump but also the publicness of it. nixon would not have taken to the podium and said, i don t like this person, this person and dan rather. he was self-controlled enough to channel that. this is different in so far as it s all just out there in the public. but this is the prejanuary 20th trump, chris. think about it. you know, william benny, the whistleblower at the nsa has called basically the spying apparatus that a president has at his disposal created by bush but continued by obama turnkey
who practice this religion why do you think it hasn t found a foot hold online? it s interesting and also true of the groups we were talking about before. very often there are password protected environments in which in the same way that people worship inside buildings rather than out in the street. if it is not a proselytizing religion, people will gather in e-mail lists and bulletin boards. the publicness or privateness of any group is reflected in their use of social media. not everybody goes to facebook first crack out of the box. and for people who want to find out more about this, where do they go? haiti. they go to haiti. haiti is the epicenter of it. i hope you re not cursed. thank you both for joining us. it s a fascinating topic. thank you to vocativ for bringing us that. ahead on rfd, another interesting, somewhat unexpected topic. we all judge society by how it treats its children or we re
so the very history you re describing is talking about a public sphere that is immediately losing resources at a time when it s finally integrated. so i think i always ask people, there s all this focus on those public bus systems in the south, when was the last time you rode a bus in the south? that those public transportation systems have just lost. that s right, there s this interesting, ironic, we talk about the 60s as the era of big government in a way, because what we re really talking about is almost immediate massive retrenchment into the private realm. so i think we need to be talking to people, what has the trade-off been to retreat. why don t we talk about we need public amenities for all citizens. but it s been a lot easier, historically, to make deals that allow the public realm to thrive when some people weren t apart of it. they could make deals around social security, when certain people weren t at the table, so there s a whole debate about like the racialization