the statement that was put out before there was an attack. so that even is factually wrong with the sequence, yet some right-wing pundits are backing romney up. listen to this. he should be very aggressive and adamant in his attacks on obama s record. they were testing us with the initial attacks and what do they get back from the obama administration? a complaint about about some this protectual film. you have obama apologizing for america. i was thankful that we had a leader that defended the united states of america and said that there will be consequences if you attack. well, this is the consistent i mean, they all conveniently leave out the statement that was made it was the calmest situation and there had been no attacks. so it wasn t apologizing for the attacks, wasn t responding
my question is, what s the rush? who is it going to hurt. how much better could we do, though, if we had two years to implement this rather than another 50 or 55 days? i think if we had two years we could do better. what s the rush? what s the rush? what s the rush, congressman? well, look, i think that the court is headed in the right direction here and i think that no one has a complaint about using an i.d. the problem is they credit a very specific i.d. right. you have to go to a transportation office and many counties, they don t even have an office for the pennsylvania department of transportation and you have to supply information and if you re born outside the state or elderly, it might be hard for to you get. so i think the burden is substantial. the risks of disenfranchising so many voters i think is a concern of the court. so i was very pleased with the ruling today. no matter what happens in this court, we ve got to make sure that in pennsylvania with we can