he will i think two things will happen, don. one is he will establish the process that he followed and the importance of where it started, which was the russian interference and how that really has to be addressed. it s the congress s obligation. they re already trying to duck and dodge dealing with it. i think this will put new pressure on protecting the coming 2020 elections. the second thing i think he s going to do in explaining his process is explain why indeed there is no prosecution as a result of this, how unusual it is because of a memo that s been there since 1973 in the department of justice about prosecuting a president. he s going to walk through that and explain why he couldn t just say, well, there s nothing here, there is a lot of evidence that there was an effort by the president to obstruct this investigation and the importance of what obstruction of justice
explain why indeed there is no prosecution as a result of this. how unusual it is. because of a memo that s bb there since 1973. in the department of justice. about prosecuting a president. he ll walk through that. and explain why he couldn t just say there s nothing here. there is a lot of evidence that there was an effort by the president to obstruct this investigation. and what obstruction of justice really means. he s seasoned and able witness. you mention 1973. you staid. you testified against nixon in 1973. you were subpoenaed. they re calling this a friendly subpoena. if so was it a friendly subpoena? i don t think it is. i actually had a friendly subpoena. when i testified before the senate. in this situation i know from my own testimony in working with
the calls and people around the nation are making calls for overall criminal justice reform and police reform more specifically, but in regards to overall criminal justice reform i think it s important for us to examine prosecute for y all strategies when you re talking about prosecuting a police officer. i think time and time again based on the results we are receiving there needs to be a deeper examination as to how these cases are being prosecuted. i m no attorney, but quite clearly i think there s overall focus on whether or not the police officer feared for their life. it seems as if during the course of a trial the focus by prosecution and allowed by the defense is whether a police officer feared for their life, not even reasonably feared for their life. what happens is they are excluding all of the elements of responsibility and culpability on the part of the police officer. we re ignoring that time and
exactly. nice to see you. thank you. prosecuting a president. officials in ukraine have put out a warrant for that country s leader, or former leader, accusing him of mass murder for killing civilians and say he has to face justice. one problem, anyway can t find him. have you seen this man s mansion and his zoo? and all the rest? what a turn of events in ukraine and what happens next matters to the united states and russia in a huge way. stay with us.
and get the lg optimus dynamic. walmart. . thanks to the rhetoric, the austerity. those left of center think the programs to cut. they are advocating and marshalling the language and logic of austerity to advocate their goals. martin o malley did that when he explained why he wants to a polish the state s death penalty. the death penalty is expensive and does not work and we should stop doing it. it s time to appeal and replace it with life without parole. prosecuting a death row case costs about three times as much as life without parole. on friday they began debating a