Thank you so much for hearing our appeal. Happy birthday. Im sorry were this is taking up your item. Time. Here is the block we live on. Our house is in the middle here. And mr. Lees house is on the right. This is the first subdivision in San Francisco. We made good effort to solve this problem with mr. Lee. He has been unwilling to compromise or find a solution. He says he needs a window for ventilation and as a fire exit. Both are which are illegal uses of Property Line window. This is the Property Line window. Our goal is to treat the permit like a new window. For several years thats what i was told would happen by the preservation folks at the Planning Department. Heres the permit. You see the permit. Unfortunately you dont see this on the screen. These are joe duffys notes about the permit. When i heard it was happening it was crazy. We filed a complaint with d. B. I. Mr. Lee was able to walk down the dbi to get a permit to change the window. Mr. Duffy made all kinds of note about
Ourselves. We are not scientists. For us to review a bible like this or to review thats nice, ill accept the data. I dont know. Maybe youre suggestion is correct one. As we sit right now with the advice that you are projecting to us, im not dismissing your advice and counsel. I know the law because we experience on a weekly basis. We might as well save the public the filing fee for the appeals if its the appeal includes any identifications as health is an issue. We can just dismiss it because wash our hands and by saying, f. E. C. , were not in control. My personal conscious wont allow me to do that. Again, we can tell the chances are slim or none because San Francisco Health Department, this is not an attack, does not want to take up this issue and does not want to fight federal statute. You can understand the position. Sure. President swig we want to protect people. I hear what youre coming from. I will take issue with your statement that the Health Department doesnt want to take on
Erica major madam clerk, any announcements . Yes. Documents to be included should be submitted to the clerk. Items acted upon today will appear on the please read the brunt first item. May we make a motion. Id like to make a motion to excuse vice chair supervisor norman yee can we take that without objection . That will be the order. And madam clerk the first item on a resolution urging the employee richard to hold a public hearing and issue a report thank you. The sponsor of that report has asked that we we mr. Unexcuse supervisor yee he showed up and supervisor yee we called item fundi have been informed this to the to postponed without objection. Supervisor yee is excused any any Public Comment on item one without objection well continue that item through the chair. Madam clerk the brunt final item. The oversight processes for the Fine Arts Museum of San Francisco and its board of trustees thank you, ms. Major colleagues as you recall on september 1st, we held a hearing looking at t
To potentially cut the windows off and make a Significant Impact on the just a minute properties thus, this question about the 1940s Building Code and that coexistence a peaceful albeit it an older creation but today a new code that could trigger eliminating these windows the Building Department will have to define that is it is too calculated under the circumstances. I have a question for mr. Patterson. Yes, sir. You made the statement it something modesty trigger the installation of a 50,000 sprinkle youre talking about the clients property. It is a mandatory bedroom Property Line window if it had to be sealed up well preserve that bedroom requires youre familiar with the requirements the only potential option we see perhaps can be poling to very expensive Sprinkler System talking about a lot of money if it is even an option may not be and but it was barred so not is an egress window. Egress is not the only requirement. Of course. Of course. And ms. Zeller removed those bars not a sa
Commissioning commissioner wilson will be absent to my left is brad the deputy City Attorney and prides the board with any legal advice and at the controls gary and im Cynthia Goldstein the boards executive director. And joined by sacramento the city Zoning Administrator and representing the Planning Commission and Planning Department devices are prohibited. Out in the hallway. Permit holders and others have up to 7 minutes to present their case and 3 minutes for rebuttal. People affiliated with these parties must conclude their comments within 7 minutes, participants not affiliated have up to 3 minutes no rebuttal. To assist the board in the accurate preparation of the minutes, members of the public are asked, not required to submit a speaker card or Business Card to the clerk. Speaker cards and pens are available on the left side of the podium. The board welcomes your comments. There are Customer Satisfaction forms available. If you have a question about the schedule, speak to the st