correspondents to somehow promote the chinese economic development, to promote the chinese successes. and now china has a propaganda apparatus in the world that is sufficient for them to promote this aspect. does it depend where the reporter works, which organisation he or she works for? or is this a view across the board as far as you re aware? yeah, i don t think it relates to a particular media, as long as it s a media that is independent of chinese regimes, sees foreign correspondents now as unwanted witnesses, they have enough power to impart their propaganda narrative through the chinese international media. which leaves us with more chinese based journalists working in china and covering china. the perception, of course, in the west is that the main chinese media always toes the party line.
correspondents to somehow promote the chinese economic development, to promote the chinese successes. and now china has a propaganda apparatus in the world that is sufficient for them to promote this aspect. does it depend where the reporter works, which organisation he or she works for? or is this a view across the board as far as you re aware? yeah, i don t think it relates to a particular media, as long as it s a media that is independent of chinese regimes, sees foreign correspondents now as unwanted witnesses, they have enough power to impart their propaganda narrative through the chinese international media. which leaves us with more chinese based journalists working in china and covering china. the perception, of course,
independent voices. now, only in the year 2000, the chinese regime has expelled 18 foreign correspondents. this was something unheard of in recent times. i believe the reason is that the chinese regime considers it doesn t need foreign correspondents any more. in the past decades, they needed foreign correspondents to somehow promote the chinese economic development, to promote the chinese successes. and now china has a propaganda apparatus in the world that is sufficient for them to promote this aspect. does it depend where the reporter works, which organisation he or she works for? or is this a view across the board as far as you re aware? yeah, i don t think it relates to a particular media, as long as it s a media
foreign correspondents. this was something unheard of in recent times. i believe the reason is that the chinese regime considers it doesn t need foreign correspondents any more. in the past decades, they needed foreign correspondents to somehow promote the chinese economic development, to promote the chinese successes. and now china has a propaganda apparatus in the world that is sufficient for them to promote this aspect. does it depend where the reporter works, which organisation he or she works for? or is this a view across the board as far as you re aware? yeah, i don t think it relates to a particular media, as long as it s a media that is independent of chinese regimes, sees foreign correspondents now as unwanted witnesses, they have enough power to impart their propaganda narrative through the chinese international media.
president xijinping got into power and cracked down on independent media independent voices. now, only in the year 2000, the chinese regime has expelled 18 foreign correspondents. this was something unheard of in recent times. i believe the reason is that the chinese regime considers it doesn t need foreign correspondents any more. in the past decades, they needed foreign correspondents to somehow promote the chinese economic development, to promote the chinese successes. and now china has a propaganda apparatus in the world that is sufficient for them to promote this aspect. does it depend where the reporter works, which organisation he or she works for? or is this a view across the board as far as you re aware? yeah, i don t think it relates