Welcome to inside story. Im ray suarez. France has stepped up its military attacks on isil after friday nights killings in paris, but paris is different too. There are now lots of soldiers on the streets of the french capital. French and belgium Security Forces launch more than 100 raids on the homes of expected extremists. Is there a level of surveillance, physical and digital, that would seriously limit future attacks . Can a free society ever clamp down enough to eliminate the threat . Would such a Society Still be free after it was protected . As security agencies mull over the threat to washington d. C. In a video released just after the paris attacks, we considered the tradeoffs been liberty and security. The delicate balance. That debate was front and center when cia director, john brennan spoke at the center for strategic and International Studies Global Security forum. I do hope that this is going to be a wakeup call, particularly in areas of europe where i think there has bee
Marginalized, and not presented externally. The second set of findings and conclusions is that the cia provided extensive inaccurate information about the program and its effectiveness to the white house, the department of justice, congress, the cia Inspector General, the media, and the american public. This conclusion is somewhat personal for me. I remember clearly when the director briefed the Intelligence Committee for the first time on the socalled eits at that september 2006 committee meeting. He referred specifically to a quote tummy slap end quote among other techniques and presented the entire set of techniques as minimally harmful and applied in a highly clinical and professional manner. They were not. The committees report demonstrates that these techniques were physically very harmful. And that the constraints that existed on paper in washington did not match the way techniques were used at said that blood testing is more precise in the past two decades, but restrictions wou
Torture techniques by the cia. Major backlash and greater security risk. This will cause voyages and death. Proafts against Police Killings of unarmed black men. New guidelines banning federal Law Enforcement from profiling. The key areas are exempted. Civil liberties groups are not happy with them. Raging fire in an apartment building. Tore through los angeles. Looked like a bomb exploded. Growing evidence that the happiest part of our lives actually begin in our 50s. Job status, marital status. Some of this may be biologically hard wired. Have you had reports in the past that you had spots on x ray . Never had x ray. How can we move forward . This may be the only chance they get. We begin with a high state of alert at u. S. Facilities around the world. Pending tuesdays release of a summary of the Senate Intelligence committees report on cia interrogations after 9 11. The summary is said to condemn techniques president obama has called torture while accusing the cia of knowingly misle
Information about the program and its effectiveness to the white house, the department of justice, congress, the c. I. A. Inspector general, the media, and the american public. This conclusion is somewhat personal for me. I remember clearly when director hayden briefed the Intelligence Committee for the first time on the socalled e. I. T. s at that september, 2006 committee meeting. He referred specifically to a quote actually slap end quote among other techniques and presented the entire set of techniques as minimally harmful and implied in a highly clinical and professional manner. They were not. The committees report demonstrates that these techniques were physically very harmful and that the constraints that existed on paper in washington did not match the way techniques were used at c. I. A. Sites around the world. A particular of particular note was the treatment of abu zubaydah over the span of 17 days in august of 2002. This involved nonstop interrogation and abuse, 24 7, from
Are you sure you want to say that, your knowledge . In fact today was the payout you you want to say that the incremental medicaid payment would, in fact, have had a surplus, not a deficit. My recollection of the numbers and i have not looked in a while by the end of the decade on a yeartoyear basis the Affordable Care act lowered the deficit. I believe that would have been deficit. You are aware this cbo has revised the number and now show a deficit and have really since shortly after the parties changed and they redid their numbers. Are you aware that they show a deficit . They no longer stand behind the numbers trying passage . I sure wish you had been aware of it. You had not heard that. I dont think so. We will check on that. One of the things that i think about and talk about is that we have a a limited amount of time to be in these offices. I am so sorry, mr. Gruber, that you said what you said. You said. You can call it conjecture, whatever. What it does is distract. It it dist