But i think it is something thats underrealized or viewed as sort of not serious. Theres a difference between being not serious and stupid. Its sort of data visualization. Right now were in the very days of that world of news content and people who have been in traditionally news look at that stuff as interesting, sort of a novelty, lets play around with that. But i think were living in an incredibly, incredibly complicated age and being able to break down issues, being able to break things down in a way thats more easily digestible and bringing those experiences right now, theyre very, very expensive and very hard to replicate on mobile devices. I think as that field grows it is going to become a bigger and bigger part of mainstream News Coverage and how we take issues and how we deliver them to people. Theres one thing that i think is, if i may, serious now that i think will be sill ly later whi is sort of niche media sites, things that are focused exclusively on one audience. There
More trust building manner than the idea that somehow another one was spying on a particular community. If i could ask you the balanced question from the other direction, i wonder, do you worry or do you think that the public as 9 11 is becoming less concerned than we should be about terrorist threats. Is this what keeps you up at night or what does keep you up at night northwest mostly in this job sn. In this city the concerns about terrorism are every day in the newspapers. We will have the event on the 15th. The opening of the 9 11 memorial museum. In october we will open a new world trade center. In as much as that is where 9 11 occurred here, its constantly in our memory and constantly in our day to day lives. Throughout the rest of america. There has been a significant drop off. I really had to fight in los angeles the years i was there. 2002 to 2000 noin. To get resources to build up a Counter Terrorism capability. Again even though los angeles had been the subject of several te
If as we slide to the right on the top chart greater participation in the premium product that means greater participation at the higher price as you can see the overall grow revenues climb up a bit when you take those gross revenues and look at it what they are on net this is what youre seeing on the bottom slide youre seeing at zero participation in the premium product full participation only in our standard product about 200,000 a year of net revenues well be able to invest in local construction or in Rate Stabilization efforts or other you know policy objectives but as the participation in the green product the darker green product grows the net revenues grow that is close to the one Million Dollars a with thirty megawatts of sales we expect the program to grow so that thirty megawatts to grow over to serving all available San Francisco residential and commercial load so what do you mean right now pg e serves 8 hundred megawatts in San Francisco and we serve thirty with our Municip
That is surveyed data but certain 0 pockets in San Francisco that are more inclined to sign up for dont work green one hundred percent ru7b8 products straeven what categories to go after you know customer bans was there be more apt to enroll in dont work green have we had this confusion. Weve begun to have those communications again now were offering both the standard you know light green product as well as the dark green product we might want to rethink who we introduce the light green product to first and who we market the dark green product to we motive want to choose to take those mathematics out again and say this was a neighborhood that was authentic and maybe market 9 dark green premium and see how many want to opt out into the premium. Do you think it would be helpful for a can comparison and the uptick over the years into whether they started at one percent now, its a 10 percent and how along that intoxicate and people are is there a way to encourage them to opt up into the be
Or not it leads to reduced rates increased customers or we then take the savings, if you will that center money into local bills; right . I mean, thats the design today. So todays design assumes any load this is contributed theyll will be margin to contribute to the rates but on the default product prides are really low and the supply costs effective we could go 50 percent renewal for that product or even higher in the commission deserves to do that but your pointing out we could stay at 50 have additional contributions to march because of the supplies are lower and take that margin and invest it in local build or Rate Stabilization or other policy objectives of the program. And it is on the reverse we talked about the rosy picture what if supply costs radio larger thats example wear asking for the authority to build it at 32 or 50 percent if the prices are hire and the program is costing more we want to slide down the scale to meet the affordability target. That includes the pg e fee