judge star, react to this sound bite, adam schiff and a young republican congresswoman. watch. thank you, mr. ne nune. will suspend. what is the interruption for. unde you re not allowed tod time except to the other member yielded time. that is not accurate. you re not recognized. this is the fifth time you have interrupted members of congress, dually dually electes of congress. the rules say you can t yield time to the freshman member. seems like not a good look for the democrats to shut someone down. exactly. this goes back to entire process point and i must say, when you depart from tradition, you may be doing the right thing, you may be reforming or you may be
private, avoid the circus, get the committee to get more answers, they did it with over 140 people. it was okay then, right? if we re going to deal with the clinton investigation and deal with kenneth starr, i ll agree with my friend doug collins. if chairman schiff wants to be kenneth starr then he should come testify in front of the committee. no, no, no, you re ducking my point, congressman. what i m saying is this is how congress did it then. you said you wanted a fair process. it s the same process that you guys allowed in clinton. why is it unacceptable today? in fairness to me i wasn t here. the idea that you weren t there, congressman, is not that compelling, right? you re now a member of a party. this is about what the past was and what you re saying is now presumptively unfair but it s what you created and used in the past. it just seems to me like you guys don t want to go against the president, the process line was to buy time and today you negated it because you do
the redacted information from the mueller report. so what kind of legal challenge could the doj mount ahead of wednesday s deadline? there is an interesting process point. the judge gave the government five days to comply with its order to turn over redacted information in the mueller report that stems from grand jury proceedings. but typically the government gets in a case like this 60 days in which to file an appeal. so we may not get a substantive decision on how it looks going forward this week. the government may try to reclaim some of its time and ask the court for additional days in which for assess whether or not it intends to file an appeal. but the outcome seems mayor wri meritorious. it is not unusual for investigators to share
their messaging on the process point and will it change anything? i think republicans are starting to break through on the fundamental unfairness of it. it s not about whether you have the power to do it or not. congress has the power to do whatever it wants. it s a political process. the issue, is it right? when it comes to undoing the will of the people you better get it right. if you don t, you re wasting everybody s time and that s why i have argued all along with the president did was inappropriate. he should not have brought up the bidens in that phone call. i have acknowledge that. the remedy is not impeachment. the remedy is an election. let the american people decide if they are sick of trump were not sick of trump. this is not up to congress. it should be up to the people. dana: ari fleischer, we always appreciate you being here. thank you. president trump is condemning commending, excuse me. committing house republicans for the impeachment of the they barged into a c
distract people from, which was bill taylor, the u.s. ambassador went before the house and according to the news reports, because we haven t seen exactly what he had to say, he said that there was evidence of a quid pro quo. dana: right. so i think that the democrats keep having every day they have a new witness. and then they leak out little bits of the testimony and you have members of congress in there, mostly democrats that come out and they say whoa, i have never seen anything like it. it s unbelievable. and then they leak out these little pieces of information. that s why the president s process point is one that i think is pretty effective. democrats saying that they want to that they might carry this on. i think it does two things for democrats. it distracts their base into thinking that they are being tough on the president. and it also prevents their base from realizing oh my god, having the house is not enough. you don t have enough power to actually do anything if you o