specific intent. he set it for the sole purpose of shutting down the flynn investigation. anything short of that, you don t have what you need. it might all be for nothing because again, is an fbi investigation a legal proceedin proceeding? let s start there and bring it to the panel. the obstruction charge, do you think people are looking at it deeply at this point? mollie: i think the central conceit of the claim based on anonymous sources is that what trump did was serious enough to lead to impeachment but not serious enough to do anything about it unless comey was fired? that seems pretty weird. when your people under oath giving testimony thing there was no obstruction of justice and we have these comments to the contrary, it seems bizarre. i will point out that if this is obstruction, we have evidence of the previous administration saying similar things in a more